2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coarse-to-fine boundary refinement network for building footprint extraction from remote sensing imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the Massachusetts building dataset, WHU building dataset and Inria Aerial Image Labeling dataset. The selected methods include convolutional networks, such as U-Net [21], Deeplabv3+ [88], SRI-Net [16], DS-Net [49], BRRNet [20], SiU-Net [18], CU-Net [19], EU-Net [89], DE-Net [90], MA-FCN [48], MANet [53], MAP-Net [27], Bias-UNet [57], CBRNet [35], and ViT-based networks like SwinUperNet [34], Sparse Token Transformer (STT) [79], MSST-Net [80], BANet [72], DC-Swin [69].…”
Section: B Comparison Of State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…the Massachusetts building dataset, WHU building dataset and Inria Aerial Image Labeling dataset. The selected methods include convolutional networks, such as U-Net [21], Deeplabv3+ [88], SRI-Net [16], DS-Net [49], BRRNet [20], SiU-Net [18], CU-Net [19], EU-Net [89], DE-Net [90], MA-FCN [48], MANet [53], MAP-Net [27], Bias-UNet [57], CBRNet [35], and ViT-based networks like SwinUperNet [34], Sparse Token Transformer (STT) [79], MSST-Net [80], BANet [72], DC-Swin [69].…”
Section: B Comparison Of State-of-the-art Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving the accuracy of building boundaries is vital for high-precision building extraction [35,[82][83][84]. Thus, we introduce the boundary supervision technology and adopt a joint loss to train the BuildFormer.…”
Section: E Loss Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of these newly developed models are benchmarked on publicly available datasets, and demonstrate outperformance, while some application-oritented studies also created their own datasets [14], [31]. For example, by exploiting low and high level features and designing a boundary refinement module, the IoU metric has been improved from 90.86% to 91.4% when tested on the WHU dataset [32]. These works can provide interesting methodological insights, even though there is usually only one percentage point rise in accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%