2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11047-017-9657-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A coarse-grained model captures the temporal evolution of DNA nanotube length distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fitted rates are generally different than those obtained in earlier work [13], which focused on a different type of nanotubes. We attribute the discrepancies to the following reasons: a) nanotubes used for these experiments include a toehold domain (in contrast to the tiles considered in [13]), which affects stacking interactions among neighboring tiles and thus polymerization/depolymerization rates; b) here invader and anti-invader reactions are modeled and fitted simultaneously with the nanotube model; c) nanotube growth experiments in [13] were conducted on a two-tile system, in which nucleation can be controlled more precisely. We compare the rates fitted here to prior results in the literature.…”
Section: Fitted Model Parameters: Invasion and Anti-invasion By Dna Mcontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Fitted rates are generally different than those obtained in earlier work [13], which focused on a different type of nanotubes. We attribute the discrepancies to the following reasons: a) nanotubes used for these experiments include a toehold domain (in contrast to the tiles considered in [13]), which affects stacking interactions among neighboring tiles and thus polymerization/depolymerization rates; b) here invader and anti-invader reactions are modeled and fitted simultaneously with the nanotube model; c) nanotube growth experiments in [13] were conducted on a two-tile system, in which nucleation can be controlled more precisely. We compare the rates fitted here to prior results in the literature.…”
Section: Fitted Model Parameters: Invasion and Anti-invasion By Dna Mcontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…This reaction rate is three orders of magnitude higher than the joining rate estimate for DNA ribbons in [21], which is 3.5 × 10 4 /M/s, and is higher than hybridization rates for DNA and RNA; this indicates that we may be overestimating the actual joining rate due to our choice of fitting constraints. Further, because we are simultaneously fitting numerous parameters with non stringent constraints, it is reasonable to expect fits falling in a broad range of values, as we showed in recent work on this model (but different nanotube type) by comparing the results of 350 fitting campaigns [13]. Finally, our fragmentation rate is in the order of 10 −4 /s, suggesting that breakage events are rare.…”
Section: Fitted Model Parameters: Invasion and Anti-invasion By Dna Msupporting
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations