A co-designed mHealth programme to support healthy lifestyles in Māori and Pasifika peoples in New Zealand (OL@-OR@): a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Background The OL@-OR@ mobile health programme was co-designed with Māori and Pasifika communities in New Zealand, to support healthy lifestyle behaviours. We aimed to determine whether use of the programme improved adherence to health-related guidelines among Māori and Pasifika communities in New Zealand compared with a control group on a waiting list for the programme. Methods The OL@-OR@ trial was a 12-week, two-arm, cluster-randomised controlled trial. A cluster was defined as any distinct location or setting in New Zealand where people with shared interests or contexts congregated, such as churches, sports clubs, and community groups. Members of a cluster were eligible to participate if they were aged 18 years or older, had regular access to a mobile device or computer, and had regular internet access. Clusters of Māori and of Pasifika (separately) were randomly assigned (1:1) to either the intervention or control condition. The intervention group received the OL@-OR@ mHealth programme (smartphone app and website). The control group received a control version of the app that only collected baseline and outcome data. The primary outcome was selfreported adherence to health-related guidelines, which were measured with a composite health behaviour score (of physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, and fruit and vegetable intake) at 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes were self-reported adherence to health-related behaviour guidelines at 4 weeks; self-reported bodyweight at 12 weeks; and holistic health and wellbeing status at 12 weeks, in all enrolled individuals in eligible clusters; and user engagement with the app, in individuals allocated to the intervention. Adverse events were not collected. This study is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12617001484336. Findings Between Jan 24 and Aug 14, 2018, we enrolled 337 Māori participants from 19 clusters and 389 Pasifika participants from 18 clusters (n=726 participants) in the intervention group and 320 Māori participants from 15 clusters and 405 Pasifika participants from 17 clusters (n=725 participants) in the control group. Of these participants, 227 (67%) Māori participants and 347 (89%) Pasifika participants (n=574 participants) in the intervention group and 281 (88%) Māori participants and 369 (91%) Pasifika participants (n=650 participants) in the control group completed the 12-week follow-up and were included in the final analysis. Relative to baseline, adherence to health-related behaviour guidelines increased at 12 weeks in both groups (315 [43%] of 726 participants at baseline to 329 [57%] of 574 participants in the intervention group; 331 [46%] of 725 participants to 369 [57%] of 650 participants in the control group); however, there was no significant difference between intervention and control groups in adherence at 12 weeks (odds ratio [OR] 1•13; 95% CI 0•84-1•52; p=0•42). Furthermore, the proportion of participants adhering to guidelines on physical activity (351 [61%] of 574 intervention group participants...

Perceived usefulness of receiving a potential smoking cessation intervention via mobile phones among smokers in Indonesia

“…Given the preference for smartphone applications for smoking cessation in our study, an application that uses pre-recorded audio and video based motivational messages could be useful. However, interventions designed should be contextual as the preference for smartphone applications over other forms mobile interventions, such as text messages, might vary globally 48 .…”

The characteristics of behaviour change interventions used among Pacific people: a systematic search and narrative synthesis

“…Fifteen studies were conducted in the USA -Hawai'i [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55], California [56] and Arkansas [57], as well as its associated territories of American Samoa [58,59] and the Marshall Islands [60]. Seven were based in New Zealand [61][62][63][64][65][66][67] including one in Australia [68] and one in Samoa [69]. Most studies involved Native Hawaiians residing in the state of Hawai'i.…”

“…Seven studies focused on Pacific only cohorts, such as Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islanders [45,53,55,56], Tongan and Samoan [62] and, Tongan, Niue and Cook Island [61] and Pacific Islanders (mixed) [67]. Two studies compared Pacific and Indigenous Māori [65,66]. Nine studies were ethnic-specific focusing only on Native Hawaiians [49,51], American Samoan [58,59], Marshallese [57,60], and Samoan [63,68,69] populations.…”

“…Among the twenty-seven studies included in the review, eleven were randomised controlled trials [44,45,48,53,55,58,59,65,66,69] and thirteen were non randomised studies [43,46,47,49,51,52,56,57,60,62,64,67,68]. Other studies used a quasi-experimental design [63], a prospective uncontrolled cohort study [61] and a descriptive intervention study [50].…”

Factors influencing the sustainability of digital health interventions in low-resource settings: Lessons from five countries

“…However, co-design may not be the single most important element of designing usable, cost-effective digital health interventions. OL@-OR@, a co-designed app to support Māori and Pacific communities with healthy lifestyle behaviour change found despite high engagement within the co-design process, evidence of actual and sustained behaviour changes were not detected in the cluster randomised trial of effectiveness [ 21 ]. Although disappointing, these results were a reminder that inclusive design processes alone may not be enough and the measure of success for this initiative was the process, not the outcome (product).…”