2022 IEEE India Council International Subsections Conference (INDISCON) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/indiscon54605.2022.9862878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CNN Bi-LSTM based Multimodal Continuous Hand Gesture Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other approach with higher accuracy than ours is [48], but only when using temporal difference as an input modality, which suggests temporal difference could provide valuable information for gesture recognition.…”
Section: B State-of-the-art Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other approach with higher accuracy than ours is [48], but only when using temporal difference as an input modality, which suggests temporal difference could provide valuable information for gesture recognition.…”
Section: B State-of-the-art Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Our proposed skeletonbased approach is compared to the approaches utilising various input modalities, where Seg, Flow and TD represent hand segmentation, optical flow and temporal difference, respectively. Temporal difference modality is proposed in [48] and it involves retrieving information from binarized absolute differences of RGB video frames. In [49], the authors extracted hand keypoints using MediaPipe from RGB video and employed the hand skeleton as the sole input modality, which is similar to our approach.…”
Section: B State-of-the-art Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Separate T-test analyses were performed to determine the accuracy of both methods. The accuracy of the Hand Gesture Recognition algorithm and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was evaluated, and the results were compared using mean accuracy [11]. The independent t-test analyses were carried out to compute the accuracy of both methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%