“…To localize the face region, we used the MediaPipe face detector [16] because it is designed for mobile implementation, providing an accurate localization with low computational complexity [12]. We compared the MediaPipe face detector with a Haar-based face detector [15] from computer complexity and accuracy points of view.…”
Section: Analysis Of Consecutive Results (First Part)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the MediaPipe face detector with a Haar-based face detector [15] from computer complexity and accuracy points of view. The comparison results show that the MediaPipe face detector provides a higher detection accuracy with fewer false positive errors and slightly faster detection speed [12]. In the MediaPipe face detector, six reference points (Figure 4) are used for a guideline to generate a bounding box.…”
Section: Analysis Of Consecutive Results (First Part)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this approach provides better performance, it is invasive to the driver because the driver must use the wearable sensors during driving. Finally, in the visual-based approach, the driver's face image or video data are analyzed to determine the driver's drowsiness and distraction levels [11][12][13][14]. The principal advantage of this approach is that it is not invasive for drivers and the performance does not depend on the driver's driving skill, vehicle type, or the road conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the face localization is carried out using a Haar-based face detector [15] or a MediaPipe face detector [16]. The drowsiness detection and/or distraction are carried out using some convolutional neural networks (CNN) [13,14], such as VGG16, MobileNet, ResNet, and some specifically designed CNNs for this purpose [11,12]. Almost all systems using this approach perform well in a laboratory environment using the GPU-based workstation, in which there are not any limitations in computing power, memory space, or energy consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed device uses a new generation of techniques employing a graphical interface as well as passive and active alarms, which allows one to communicate to the driver if he or she is driving dangerously, to avoid a possible accident. Unlike previously proposed devices in different research papers [11][12][13][14], SOMN_IA is a universal system, which allows its implementation in any type of vehicle because the device can be connected using a plug-in BUCK-type DC-DC converter to the car battery. The SOMN_IA contains, besides a main operation unit, an input-port for a single camera with a visible and an infrared spectrum, and a graphical interface, including a sound alarm to inform the driver about his/her dangerous state.…”
In this paper, we propose a portable device named SOMN_IA, to detect drowsiness and distraction in drivers. The SOMN_IA can be installed inside of any type of vehicle, and it operates in real time, alerting the dangerous state caused by drowsiness and/or distraction in the driver. The SOMN_IA contains three types of alarm: light alarm, sound alarm, and the transmission of information about the driver’s dangerous state to a third party if the driver does not correct his/her dangerous state. The SOMN_IA contains a face detector and a classifier based on the convolutional neural networks (CNN), and it aids in the management of consecutive information, including isolated error correction mechanisms. All of the algorithmic parts of the SOMN_IA are analyzed and adjusted to operate in real-time in a portable device with limited computational power and memory space. The SOMN_IA requires only a buck-type converter to connect to the car battery. The SONM_IA discriminates correctly between real drowsiness and normal blinking, as well as between real dangerous distraction and a driver’s normal attention to his/her right and left. Although the real performance of the SOMN_IA is superior to the CNN classification accuracy thanks to isolated error correction, we compare the CNN classification accuracy with the previous systems.
“…To localize the face region, we used the MediaPipe face detector [16] because it is designed for mobile implementation, providing an accurate localization with low computational complexity [12]. We compared the MediaPipe face detector with a Haar-based face detector [15] from computer complexity and accuracy points of view.…”
Section: Analysis Of Consecutive Results (First Part)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the MediaPipe face detector with a Haar-based face detector [15] from computer complexity and accuracy points of view. The comparison results show that the MediaPipe face detector provides a higher detection accuracy with fewer false positive errors and slightly faster detection speed [12]. In the MediaPipe face detector, six reference points (Figure 4) are used for a guideline to generate a bounding box.…”
Section: Analysis Of Consecutive Results (First Part)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this approach provides better performance, it is invasive to the driver because the driver must use the wearable sensors during driving. Finally, in the visual-based approach, the driver's face image or video data are analyzed to determine the driver's drowsiness and distraction levels [11][12][13][14]. The principal advantage of this approach is that it is not invasive for drivers and the performance does not depend on the driver's driving skill, vehicle type, or the road conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the face localization is carried out using a Haar-based face detector [15] or a MediaPipe face detector [16]. The drowsiness detection and/or distraction are carried out using some convolutional neural networks (CNN) [13,14], such as VGG16, MobileNet, ResNet, and some specifically designed CNNs for this purpose [11,12]. Almost all systems using this approach perform well in a laboratory environment using the GPU-based workstation, in which there are not any limitations in computing power, memory space, or energy consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed device uses a new generation of techniques employing a graphical interface as well as passive and active alarms, which allows one to communicate to the driver if he or she is driving dangerously, to avoid a possible accident. Unlike previously proposed devices in different research papers [11][12][13][14], SOMN_IA is a universal system, which allows its implementation in any type of vehicle because the device can be connected using a plug-in BUCK-type DC-DC converter to the car battery. The SOMN_IA contains, besides a main operation unit, an input-port for a single camera with a visible and an infrared spectrum, and a graphical interface, including a sound alarm to inform the driver about his/her dangerous state.…”
In this paper, we propose a portable device named SOMN_IA, to detect drowsiness and distraction in drivers. The SOMN_IA can be installed inside of any type of vehicle, and it operates in real time, alerting the dangerous state caused by drowsiness and/or distraction in the driver. The SOMN_IA contains three types of alarm: light alarm, sound alarm, and the transmission of information about the driver’s dangerous state to a third party if the driver does not correct his/her dangerous state. The SOMN_IA contains a face detector and a classifier based on the convolutional neural networks (CNN), and it aids in the management of consecutive information, including isolated error correction mechanisms. All of the algorithmic parts of the SOMN_IA are analyzed and adjusted to operate in real-time in a portable device with limited computational power and memory space. The SOMN_IA requires only a buck-type converter to connect to the car battery. The SONM_IA discriminates correctly between real drowsiness and normal blinking, as well as between real dangerous distraction and a driver’s normal attention to his/her right and left. Although the real performance of the SOMN_IA is superior to the CNN classification accuracy thanks to isolated error correction, we compare the CNN classification accuracy with the previous systems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.