The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-07750-0_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CNN-Based Driver’s Drowsiness and Distraction Detection System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To localize the face region, we used the MediaPipe face detector [16] because it is designed for mobile implementation, providing an accurate localization with low computational complexity [12]. We compared the MediaPipe face detector with a Haar-based face detector [15] from computer complexity and accuracy points of view.…”
Section: Analysis Of Consecutive Results (First Part)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To localize the face region, we used the MediaPipe face detector [16] because it is designed for mobile implementation, providing an accurate localization with low computational complexity [12]. We compared the MediaPipe face detector with a Haar-based face detector [15] from computer complexity and accuracy points of view.…”
Section: Analysis Of Consecutive Results (First Part)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the MediaPipe face detector with a Haar-based face detector [15] from computer complexity and accuracy points of view. The comparison results show that the MediaPipe face detector provides a higher detection accuracy with fewer false positive errors and slightly faster detection speed [12]. In the MediaPipe face detector, six reference points (Figure 4) are used for a guideline to generate a bounding box.…”
Section: Analysis Of Consecutive Results (First Part)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations