2021
DOI: 10.1109/tbcas.2021.3068710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CMOS Multi-Modal Electrochemical and Impedance Cellular Sensing Array for Massively Paralleled Exoelectrogen Screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous biological and biomedical applications, such as cell-based assays/actuators, , implantable devices, , wearable electronics, drug/chemical biomonitoring, and synthetic biology rely primarily on electrode–cell or electrode–tissue interfaces with good biocompatibility, low impedance, high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), long-term electrochemical stability, and minimum biofouling. These applications have broad and profound impacts including broadening fundamental understanding of biological processes through organ-on-chip devices, treating brain injuries via neuroprosthesis, and accelerating drug discovery with multi-modal cell-based sensors. The electrode–cell/–tissue interfaces enable spatiotemporal recording of various cellular signals, for example, intra-/extra-cellular potentials, local field potentials (LFPs), cell–cell/cell–surface impedances, as well as bioelectrical stimulation and a wide variety of electrochemical reactions. ,,,, For intimate monitoring of cellular parameters, there is a considerably growing interest in improving spatiotemporal resolution, increasing the total field-of-view (FoV), minimizing the device invasiveness, and boosting the number of simultaneous parallel readout channels. , Consequently, enhancing spatial resolution entails aggressively trimming the electrode sizes toward subcellular features (<5 μm) and scaling the total FoV to the tissue-level monitoring (>2–3 mm), a feat that requires extremely dense yet large-scale microelectrode arrays (MEAs) on rigid or flexible substrates with high reliability. However, such extreme miniaturization of electrodes inevitably limits the electrodes’ electrochemically active area and drastically increases the electrode–electrolyte or electrode–cell interfacial impedance. , The increased interfacial impedance directly raises thermal noise that deteriorates interface SNR and consequently constrains any electrical or electrochemical detection. , Furthermore, many in vivo (e.g., pacemakers and neuroprosthetics) and in vitro (e.g., lab-on-chip devices with cell-based assays) applications demand low electrode–cell interfacial impedance to support cellular bioelectrical stimulation with minimal invasiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous biological and biomedical applications, such as cell-based assays/actuators, , implantable devices, , wearable electronics, drug/chemical biomonitoring, and synthetic biology rely primarily on electrode–cell or electrode–tissue interfaces with good biocompatibility, low impedance, high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), long-term electrochemical stability, and minimum biofouling. These applications have broad and profound impacts including broadening fundamental understanding of biological processes through organ-on-chip devices, treating brain injuries via neuroprosthesis, and accelerating drug discovery with multi-modal cell-based sensors. The electrode–cell/–tissue interfaces enable spatiotemporal recording of various cellular signals, for example, intra-/extra-cellular potentials, local field potentials (LFPs), cell–cell/cell–surface impedances, as well as bioelectrical stimulation and a wide variety of electrochemical reactions. ,,,, For intimate monitoring of cellular parameters, there is a considerably growing interest in improving spatiotemporal resolution, increasing the total field-of-view (FoV), minimizing the device invasiveness, and boosting the number of simultaneous parallel readout channels. , Consequently, enhancing spatial resolution entails aggressively trimming the electrode sizes toward subcellular features (<5 μm) and scaling the total FoV to the tissue-level monitoring (>2–3 mm), a feat that requires extremely dense yet large-scale microelectrode arrays (MEAs) on rigid or flexible substrates with high reliability. However, such extreme miniaturization of electrodes inevitably limits the electrodes’ electrochemically active area and drastically increases the electrode–electrolyte or electrode–cell interfacial impedance. , The increased interfacial impedance directly raises thermal noise that deteriorates interface SNR and consequently constrains any electrical or electrochemical detection. , Furthermore, many in vivo (e.g., pacemakers and neuroprosthetics) and in vitro (e.g., lab-on-chip devices with cell-based assays) applications demand low electrode–cell interfacial impedance to support cellular bioelectrical stimulation with minimal invasiveness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous biological and biomedical applications, such as cellbased assays/actuators, 1,2 implantable devices, 3,4 wearable electronics, 5 drug/chemical biomonitoring, 6 and synthetic biology 7 rely primarily on electrode−cell or electrode−tissue interfaces with good biocompatibility, low impedance, high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), long-term electrochemical stability, and minimum biofouling. These applications have broad and profound impacts including broadening fundamental understanding of biological processes through organ-on-chip devices, 8−12 treating brain injuries via neuroprosthesis, 13−15 and accelerating drug discovery with multi-modal cell-based sensors.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Kumashi et al (2021), a CMOS sensor array with 256 pixel channels is fabricated based on the 130-nm BiCMOS process, which is used for electrochemical reaction and impedance detection of the biological surface as shown in Figure 15. This sensor array has 16 parallel readout channels, so it can measure high-throughput data quickly and process different samples.…”
Section: Figure 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it enables potentiostatic control in each well compared to purely passive voltage sensing in 2-electrode arrangements (Szydlowski et al, 2022). Noteworthy, this is also clearly different and advantageous when being compared to previous work (Kumashi et al, 2021;Molderez et al, 2021) that offers a high degree of parallelization in terms of working electrodes, but makes use of a shared reaction chamber. Thus, the ec-MP introduced here also allows the study of simultaneously and truly independently electroactive pure and mixed cultures over time, for example, in different media or at different pH.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%