2011
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cluster-Randomised Trial of Staff Education to Improve the Quality of Life of People with Dementia Living in Residential Care: The DIRECT Study

Abstract: BackgroundThe Dementia In Residential care: EduCation intervention Trial (DIRECT) was conducted to determine if delivery of education designed to meet the perceived need of GPs and care staff improves the quality of life of participants with dementia living in residential care.Methodology/Principal FindingsThis cluster-randomised controlled trial was conducted in 39 residential aged care facilities in the metropolitan area of Perth, Western Australia. 351 care facility residents aged 65 years and older with Mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Considering the limited nature of the educational intervention, and the lack of follow-up and reinforcement, the results obtained in this study are promising. Previous studies with a more robust design 35 and longer NH staff educational interventions (6 months) failed to show any impact on the quality of life of dementia patients. Moreover, in other studies, the educational intervention supported the implementation of videos for relatives 30 or of the Gold Standard Framework in Care Homes 12e14 with the implementation of organizational tools, support from facilitators, helpline and conference calls, 12 the support of specialist care nurses, 14 the identification of key champions, 13 whereas in the present study, besides the educational intervention, no other forms of support were provided, with the exception of the possibility (although it was never used) to contact experts for support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…34 Considering the limited nature of the educational intervention, and the lack of follow-up and reinforcement, the results obtained in this study are promising. Previous studies with a more robust design 35 and longer NH staff educational interventions (6 months) failed to show any impact on the quality of life of dementia patients. Moreover, in other studies, the educational intervention supported the implementation of videos for relatives 30 or of the Gold Standard Framework in Care Homes 12e14 with the implementation of organizational tools, support from facilitators, helpline and conference calls, 12 the support of specialist care nurses, 14 the identification of key champions, 13 whereas in the present study, besides the educational intervention, no other forms of support were provided, with the exception of the possibility (although it was never used) to contact experts for support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…While Beer et al (2011) found that delivery of education for either general practitioners or care staffs have no effect on improving QoL in residents with dementia. Also, Orpwood et al (2007) recognised that application of dementia-led assistive technology, such as a simple music player and a conversation prompter, in elderly people with dementia appears linked to increase in their QoL.…”
Section: Religious Environmental and Other Factorsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Costs, staff shortages, staff turnover and communication problems are cited as barriers to sustainable improvements in the care of people living in residential care facilities [2]. Although educational interventions in residential care may be evaluated positively by participants [3], we found evidence that impact on residents may be restricted by limited staff participation [4]. Focusing on sustainable culture change may offer an alternative method of quality improvement in residential care settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%