2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01329
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cloud Computing Platform for Scalable Relative and Absolute Binding Free Energy Predictions: New Opportunities and Challenges for Drug Discovery

Abstract: Free energy perturbation (FEP) has become widely used in drug discovery programs for binding affinity prediction between candidate compounds and their biological targets. However, limitations of FEP applications also exist, including, but not limited to, high cost, long waiting time, limited scalability, and breadth of application scenarios. To overcome these problems, we have developed XFEP, a scalable cloud computing platform for both relative and absolute free energy predictions using optimized simulation p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
45
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(148 reference statements)
6
45
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculations are the most common and widespread applications of FEP for drug discovery projects. We used the XFEP platform which have been developed by XtalPi for the FEP calculations 49 The XFEP platform constitutes the backbone of an integrated workflow coupling FEP calculations with AI models and wet-lab experiments. XFEP utilizes the AMBER software package 46 for free energy calculations.…”
Section: Computational Methods To Optimize Ligand Binding Posementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relative binding free energy (RBFE) calculations are the most common and widespread applications of FEP for drug discovery projects. We used the XFEP platform which have been developed by XtalPi for the FEP calculations 49 The XFEP platform constitutes the backbone of an integrated workflow coupling FEP calculations with AI models and wet-lab experiments. XFEP utilizes the AMBER software package 46 for free energy calculations.…”
Section: Computational Methods To Optimize Ligand Binding Posementioning
confidence: 99%
“…XFEP utilizes the AMBER software package 46 for free energy calculations. All simulations were performed using the TIP3P water model, as well as AMBER ff14SB for the proteins and XForce Field (XFF) 49 , developed by XtalPi, with a system-specific force field refinement protocol for the ligands. All simulations used a Langevin integrator with a 2 fs timestep for heating and equilibration, 4 fs for production, and a friction coefficient of 2 ps −1 .…”
Section: Computational Methods To Optimize Ligand Binding Posementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the uncertainties of the reference data are negligible, this approach tests directly the quality of the expanded uncertainties for the predicted values U (V ) 95 . Otherwise, the quality of the reference set uncertainties U (R) 95 will also affect the results.…”
Section: Expanded Uncertainty Of Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reference data, in absence of specific information, I assumed that expanded uncertainties were used (U (R) 95 ). The process of PU estimation in the FPD method has been summarized above (Section II B 1), and it is difficult to infer its nature, beyond a possible over-estimation implied by the worst-case scenario strategy.…”
Section: The Fel2008 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, those two studies are among the first large-scale applications of ABFE in a virtual screening campaign. In recent years automated high-throughput explicit solvent ABFE protocols are being rapidly developed for docking refinement in virtual screening on GPU and cloud computing platforms [ 29 31 ]. We also note that similar virtual screening workflows have been successfully applied in recent drug discovery studies against SARS-CoV-2 [ 32 , 33 ], and Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) capsid [ 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%