2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A closer look at right ventricular 3D volume quantification by transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, tricuspid regurgitation peak gradient(TRPG)/TAPSE ratio has been described as a possible, more accurate marker of RV function . More recently, the addition of 3DRVEF has also improved the quantitative examination of the RV …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, tricuspid regurgitation peak gradient(TRPG)/TAPSE ratio has been described as a possible, more accurate marker of RV function . More recently, the addition of 3DRVEF has also improved the quantitative examination of the RV …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 More recently, the addition of 3DRVEF has also improved the quantitative examination of the RV. 19 Many studies have shown that the changes in these above-mentioned parameters used to evaluate RV functions are also associated with mortality in APE. [20][21][22] TAPSE is generally accepted as a trustable, sensitive, and easily measurable parameter for the initial diagnosis and for the tracking of RV function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Right ventricular free wall strain by speckle-tracking and RVEF by three-dimensional echocardiography are emerging techniques for the measurement of RV function. These techniques, though promising, rely an excellent image quality and have variable feasibility rates in inpatient and critical care settings (20,(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides more refinements in echocardiogram images than 2D parameters. [21][22][23][24] However, reported data to determine the accuracy of echocardiography 3D RV EF comparing with RV EF by CMR is limited in literature. 21 Cardiac magnetic resonance remains more commonly used to assess RV function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%