2005
DOI: 10.1080/02699200410001716165
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A closer look at MLU: What does it really measure?

Abstract: Despite the common use of mean length of utterance (MLU) as a diagnostic measure, what it actually reflects in terms of linguistic knowledge is relatively unclear. This study explored the extent to which variance in MLU could be accounted for by a measure of expressive vocabulary and a measure of morphosyntax in a group of 44 typically-developing children, ages 28-37 months. Regression techniques were employed to predict MLU from number of different words (NDW) and a tense accuracy composite (TAC). Depending o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies have highlighted that language-sample measures correlate more strongly with each other than with standardized tests and that standardized tests across multiple domains tend to correlate with each other (cf. Condouris et al, 2003;DeThorne, Johnson, & Loeb, 2005;DeThorne & Watkins, 2006;Ukrainetz & Blomquist, 2002). Of course, from a psychometric standpoint, influences other than the construct of interest are often chalked up to "error"; however, it is interesting to consider just how much the concept of error applies when findings are stable both within forms of assessment (e.g., productive-language sample, standardized tests) and across measurement time points.…”
Section: Interpreting the Differing Etiologies Of The Two Language Famentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have highlighted that language-sample measures correlate more strongly with each other than with standardized tests and that standardized tests across multiple domains tend to correlate with each other (cf. Condouris et al, 2003;DeThorne, Johnson, & Loeb, 2005;DeThorne & Watkins, 2006;Ukrainetz & Blomquist, 2002). Of course, from a psychometric standpoint, influences other than the construct of interest are often chalked up to "error"; however, it is interesting to consider just how much the concept of error applies when findings are stable both within forms of assessment (e.g., productive-language sample, standardized tests) and across measurement time points.…”
Section: Interpreting the Differing Etiologies Of The Two Language Famentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NTW reflects volubility and overall verbal proficiency, and is highly correlated with utterance length and NDW (DeThorne, Johnson, & Loeb, 2005). In a comparison of the utility of automated analyses within the HV5 data, NTW was the single best predictor of overall narrative skill (Mahurin Smith & DeThorne, 2008).…”
Section: Number Of Different Words/number Of Total Words (Ndw/ntw)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MLU-w is considered a reliable measure of language acquisition, as well as a good marker to identify speech-language pathology 26,27 . Some authors recognize a strong correlation between this measure and the semantic and morphosyntactic competences of children with typical development 28 .…”
Section: Mean Length Of Utterancementioning
confidence: 99%