2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A closed-loop supply chain network considering consumer's low carbon preference and carbon tax under the cap-and-trade regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, Aiying and Risto [ 25 ] applied the carbon trading system to large-scale industrial activities; Chai et al [ 26 ] studied how carbon allowances and carbon emissions trading can be conducive to remanufacturing, and discovered that in the long run manufacturers should invest in low carbon production technology; Aldieri et al [ 27 ] found that the green innovation subsidy policy can help the enterprises to adopt to the green technology and increase their level of employment; Huang et al [ 28 ] found that the green credit in a supply chain is good for social welfare and environmental benefit. Lee [ 29 ] found that the supply chain members’ participation in green innovation activities could achieve a win-win scenario in the CLSC; Xia et al [ 30 ] found that the emergence of carbon trading systems will affect the low-carbon behavior of the OEMs; Yang et al [ 31 ] studied the selection of remanufacturing collection modes under the carbon emission trading system; Li et al [ 32 ] found that the government subsidy strategy could reduce carbon emissions; Lv and Li [ 33 ] studied the influence of green consumers on enterprises’ green innovation and found that enterprises would choose to carry out green innovation when green consumers exist in the market; Wang et al [ 34 ] found that stringent regulations do not imply more remanufacturing; Cheng et al [ 35 ] found that manufacturers will increase their green technology investment level under the carbon emission constraint; Sarkar et al [ 36 ] found that green innovation can increase the sale quantity of the product; Xue et al [ 37 ] found that consumers’ low-carbon awareness could increase the profits of supply chain members; Yang et al [ 38 ] did a series of studies on the introduction of carbon emissions trading into remanufacturing. From the above research, it is evident that under the carbon trading system, producers’ production behaviors are constrained in such a way that they will be actively assuming the social responsibility of reducing carbon emissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, Aiying and Risto [ 25 ] applied the carbon trading system to large-scale industrial activities; Chai et al [ 26 ] studied how carbon allowances and carbon emissions trading can be conducive to remanufacturing, and discovered that in the long run manufacturers should invest in low carbon production technology; Aldieri et al [ 27 ] found that the green innovation subsidy policy can help the enterprises to adopt to the green technology and increase their level of employment; Huang et al [ 28 ] found that the green credit in a supply chain is good for social welfare and environmental benefit. Lee [ 29 ] found that the supply chain members’ participation in green innovation activities could achieve a win-win scenario in the CLSC; Xia et al [ 30 ] found that the emergence of carbon trading systems will affect the low-carbon behavior of the OEMs; Yang et al [ 31 ] studied the selection of remanufacturing collection modes under the carbon emission trading system; Li et al [ 32 ] found that the government subsidy strategy could reduce carbon emissions; Lv and Li [ 33 ] studied the influence of green consumers on enterprises’ green innovation and found that enterprises would choose to carry out green innovation when green consumers exist in the market; Wang et al [ 34 ] found that stringent regulations do not imply more remanufacturing; Cheng et al [ 35 ] found that manufacturers will increase their green technology investment level under the carbon emission constraint; Sarkar et al [ 36 ] found that green innovation can increase the sale quantity of the product; Xue et al [ 37 ] found that consumers’ low-carbon awareness could increase the profits of supply chain members; Yang et al [ 38 ] did a series of studies on the introduction of carbon emissions trading into remanufacturing. From the above research, it is evident that under the carbon trading system, producers’ production behaviors are constrained in such a way that they will be actively assuming the social responsibility of reducing carbon emissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang et al (2022) found that when consumer environmental awareness is enhanced, manufacturers with lower carbon emissions would choose to expand production. Cheng et al (2021) explored the influence of low-and high-emission manufacturers on optimal equilibrium decision-making in a closed-loop supply chain. They found that an improvement in consumer environmental awareness can increase the trade volume of low-emission manufacturers.…”
Section: Carbon Emission Reductions and Consumer Environmental Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feng et al (2020) focus on the issue of the joint replenishment among retailers under a GM, and find that the retailer with the most altruistic behaviour obtained surplus carbon allowances from other retailers. Cheng et al (2022) discuss the lower carbon emissions technology for a closed-loop supply chain between GM and tax mechanisms, and they find that these carbon mechanisms could improve the lower carbon emissions technology investment. This paper differs from the above studies.…”
Section: Cap-and-trade Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%