2011
DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2011.551989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Close Examination of Trait Reactance and Issue Involvement as Moderators of Psychological Reactance Theory

Abstract: This study used psychological reactance theory (PRT) to investigate (a) the effectiveness of 2 message features (freedom-threatening language and character frame) and (b) the role of trait reactance and issue involvement as moderators of a perceived freedom threat. Within the context of organ donation, the results indicated no differences for character frame among the donor, recipient, or waiting list narratives. However, freedom-threatening language was positively associated with a perceived freedom threat. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
61
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when brand messages are written in the communal communication style, high and low reactance individuals perceived the same level of irritation. This finding coincides with existing research on trait reactance in the advertising and health communication area, such that high reactance people are more likely than are low reactance people to perceive a persuasive message as an attempt to threaten their freedom (e.g., Grandpre, Alvaro, Burgoon, Miller, & Hall, 2009;Quick et al, 2011;White, Zahay, Thorbjørnsen, & Shavitt, 2008). Because the exchange style of creating earned impressions resembles a persuasive message, high reactance people may consider the exchange style as a threat to their freedom.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when brand messages are written in the communal communication style, high and low reactance individuals perceived the same level of irritation. This finding coincides with existing research on trait reactance in the advertising and health communication area, such that high reactance people are more likely than are low reactance people to perceive a persuasive message as an attempt to threaten their freedom (e.g., Grandpre, Alvaro, Burgoon, Miller, & Hall, 2009;Quick et al, 2011;White, Zahay, Thorbjørnsen, & Shavitt, 2008). Because the exchange style of creating earned impressions resembles a persuasive message, high reactance people may consider the exchange style as a threat to their freedom.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, in this study, we explored the unique effect of earned impressions in brand-building relationships between advertisers and customers. Specifically, we examined how trait reactance, that is, the personality traits that influence one's resistance to persuasive messages (Quick, Scott, & Ledbetter, 2011), plays a role when customers are exposed to branded content in the form of earned impressions (vs. paid advertisements) in a social media context. Our aim was to provide a deeper understanding of the effects of earned impressions when using Facebook as an advertising medium.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such instances, the version of the case published in a journal was used for the analyses. In addition, there were two instances in which the same data regarding reactance (i.e., associations among freedom threat, anger, counterarguments, and attitude) were used in different projects (Kim & Levine, 2008a, 2008c and Quick, 2010; Quick & Scott, 2009; Quick, Scott, & Ledbetter, 2011). Data from the most recent report were used for the meta‐analyses (Kim & Levine, 2008a; Quick et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its resurgence in the 1990s, PRT has been applied to examine change in a variety of behaviors, including alcohol consumption (Bensley & Wu, 1991;Dillard & Shen, 2005), smoking (Grandpre et al, 2003), flossing (Dillard & Shen, 2005), exercise (Miller, Lane, Deatrick, Young, & Potts, 2007), and organ donation (Quick, Scott, & Ledbetter, 2011). A variety of message factors have also been explored using a PRT framework.…”
Section: Psychological Reactancementioning
confidence: 99%