2010
DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2010.38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A clinical trial assessing the safety and efficacy of the CB1R inverse agonist taranabant in obese and overweight patients: low-dose study

Abstract: All three doses of taranabant-induced clinically meaningful and statistically significant weight loss. Incidences of adverse experiences in organ systems known to express CB1R were higher in taranabant groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Decreased food intake in rodents and, to a lesser extent in humans, is accompanied by a robust reduction in body weight that is associated with an improved metabolic profile (Ravinet Trillou et al 2003;Gary-Bobo et al 2007;Janiak et al 2007;Van Gaal et al 2008). Together with similar clinical findings from a subsequent CB1 receptor inverse agonist, taranabant (Lin et al 2006;Aronne et al 2010;Proietto et al 2010;Wadden et al 2010), blockade of the CB1 receptor may thus be considered as a clinically well-validated target for production of modest but meaningful weight loss and reduced cardiovascular risk factors in obesity (Pi-Sunyer et al 2006;Van Gaal et al 2008;Wadden et al 2010). Some considerable debate, however, remains about the best way in which to target CB1 receptors for weight and metabolic control.…”
Section: F%mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Decreased food intake in rodents and, to a lesser extent in humans, is accompanied by a robust reduction in body weight that is associated with an improved metabolic profile (Ravinet Trillou et al 2003;Gary-Bobo et al 2007;Janiak et al 2007;Van Gaal et al 2008). Together with similar clinical findings from a subsequent CB1 receptor inverse agonist, taranabant (Lin et al 2006;Aronne et al 2010;Proietto et al 2010;Wadden et al 2010), blockade of the CB1 receptor may thus be considered as a clinically well-validated target for production of modest but meaningful weight loss and reduced cardiovascular risk factors in obesity (Pi-Sunyer et al 2006;Van Gaal et al 2008;Wadden et al 2010). Some considerable debate, however, remains about the best way in which to target CB1 receptors for weight and metabolic control.…”
Section: F%mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(n=4-6 per group) and Lutz 2008; Jacob et al 2009), and thus may be considered to have shown modest predictive validity for the anxiogenic findings in clinical studies with rimonabant. Sleep-wake EEG was chosen because alterations in sleepwake behavior have been previously reported for rimonabant in rats (Santucci et al 1996) and insomnia reported as an adverse event for both rimonabant (Pi-Sunyer et al 2006) and taranabant (Aronne et al 2010;Proietto et al 2010) and because sleep-wake EEG is considered a translatable paradigm (polysomnography).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chronic CP55,940-treated WT, but not CB 1 KO mice, showed profound withdrawal signs when challenged with the CB 1 antagonist rimonabant, suggesting precipitation at CB 1 receptors produces withdrawal symptoms (Tsou et al, 1995;Aceto et al, 1996;Cook et al, 1998;Rubino et al, 1998;Lichtman et al, 2001). Interestingly, although rimonabant challenge preferentially increased scratching bouts in mice treated with CP55,940 compared with vehicle, rimonabantelicited scratching was notably absent in CB 1 KO mice, demonstrating that antagonist-induced scratching [analogous to pruritis (Proietto et al, 2010)] in the absence of chronic cannabinoid dosing is mediated by CB 1 receptors, rather than an off-target effect of rimonabant. Our studies are the first to evaluate possible signs of physical dependence in animal pain models associated with repeated systemic activation of CB 2 receptors [present data and (Deng et al, 2015)].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adverse effects reported, such as nausea and/or emesis and anhedonia or depression-related effects, are opposite to effects in humans commonly attributed to CB 1 agonists and, moreover, are not unique to rimonabant. Evidence that other CB 1 inverse agonists such as AM251 or taranabant have rimonabant-like profiles of action, including potential adverse effects, have similarly precluded their clinical application (Pertwee, 2005;Addy et al, 2008;Aronne et al, 2010;Proietto et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%