2001
DOI: 10.1136/qhc.0100245..
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A clinical informaticist to support primary care decision making

Abstract: The clinical informaticist service increased access to evidence for busy clinicians. Satisfaction was high among users and clinicians stated that changes in practice would occur. However, uptake of the service was lower than expected (22% of those offered the service). Further research is needed into how this method of increasing access to evidence compares with other strategies, and whether it results in improved health outcomes for patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Six of these studies are from New Zealand, Australia and the UK. 5,6,9,14,23,32 It is acknowledged that these studies may not be relevant for other professional groups of doctors. However, it should not be assumed that any professional group is cohesive enough to be a distinct unique group.…”
Section: Differences According To Type Of Healthcare Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six of these studies are from New Zealand, Australia and the UK. 5,6,9,14,23,32 It is acknowledged that these studies may not be relevant for other professional groups of doctors. However, it should not be assumed that any professional group is cohesive enough to be a distinct unique group.…”
Section: Differences According To Type Of Healthcare Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 This can deter them from even beginning to search for information. 17 Studies show that 'few wish to develop the necessary skills' 11 and 'do not generally have the time or inclination to perform lengthy literature searches.' 18 However, Doney et al .…”
Section: Information Seeking Behaviour and Information Needsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details of the project are reported elsewhere. 26 Of 100 clinicians invited to use the service, only 34 wished to participate. The service had its enthusiasts-a quarter of the questions came from one group practice, and the two highest users generated 13 of the 60 questions.…”
Section: Clinical Informaticist Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information services tend to be remote from the day-to-day reality of general practice-there is an obvious geographical divide, as they are traditionally located in the postgraduate library, but there is also a cultural divide, neither professional perhaps fully aware of how the other one works or the potential in working more closely together. 31 Table 1 A comparison between the Imperial and Basildon informaticist services Imperial 26,30,35 Basildon 29,30 'like a laboratory test service' 'friendly local facilitator' Low emphasis on personal contact High emphasis on personal contact Strong research component Strong service component Focus on academic rigour and technical excellence Focus on identifying important questions through face-to-face dialogue All relevant primary and secondary sources identified and appraised Pragmatic approach-'find out what we can and share it' using easily accessible sources None of project team involved in local service general practice Strong local links of project leader (a local GP) enabled integration into a clinical effectiveness unit There needs to be a greater partnership between information professionals and clinicians in primary care to fully realize the potential of information services. Whilst delivery of information via the Internet offers huge promise, there may be potential, alongside web-based initiatives such as the National Electronic Library for Health, for more personalized community-based services with an explicit aim of facilitating informationseeking behaviour and providing information which is tailored to the local primary care context.…”
Section: The Role Of Information Professionals In Facilitating Evidenmentioning
confidence: 99%