A clinical evaluation of the efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the treatment of erosive oral lichen planus: A case series

et al. 2020

Preprint

Background Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new option for oral lichen planus (OLP) management; however, there are different opinions on the efficacy of PDT for OLP. The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess the efficacy of PDT in the treatment of OLP and compare PDT with steroid therapy . Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the curative effect of PDT. Five electronic databases were searched, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and EBSCO up to 1 December, 2019. Random and fixed effects models for pooled estimates calculation were used and the Meta package of R was applied. Results Pooled estimates revealed that, after PDT, the lesion size decreased by 1.53 cm 2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–2.35) after PDT and the partial response (PR) was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65–0.85). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score decreased by 3.82 (95% CI: 2.80–4.85) and the Thongprasom sign score decreased by 1.33 (95% CI: 0.56–2.10) after PDT. Subgroup analyses revealed that the 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was more effective than methylene blue (MB), with a PR of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91). The topical use of 5-ALA yielded a better response than gargling methylene blue. In terms of VAS, the diode laser showed a better clinical PR in the treatment of OLP. In terms of changes in lesion size, the efficacy of the semiconductor laser was higher than that of the diode laser. PDT had a similar efficacy to topical corticosteroids, as shown by pooled estimates of five randomised controlled trials with 139 lesions. Conclusion PDT could be a valuable optional treatment for the management of OLP. And the results indicated that the curative effect of PDT is similar to that of topical corticosteroids in the treatment of OLP.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Four full-text were excluded as one was case report and three articles were not English. After full-text screening, 16 studies were considered for qualitative assessment and 13 studies were included for quantitative synthesis [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”

Section: Demographic Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy evaluation of photodynamic therapy for oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Deng²,

et al. 2020

Preprint

“…Some scholars [26] supported a hypothesis that PDT stimulates healing processes which become even more evident over long-term observation, particularly within masticatory mucosa. This tentative hypothesis needs to be confirmed by a greater number of cured cases.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4 full-text were excluded by reasons that one was case report and three articles were not English. After full-text screening, 16 studies were considered for qualitative assessment, and 13 studies were included for quantitative synthesis [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”

Section: Demographic Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy evaluation of the photodynamic therapy for oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Deng²,

et al. 2020

Preprint

Background Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new option for oral lichen planus (OLP) management, while there are different opinions on the efficacy of PDT for OLP. To comprehensively assess the efficacy of PDT in the treatment of OLP, and compare it with steroid therapy . Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the curative effect of PDT, five electronic databases were searched, including PubMed, Web of Science (SCI), the Cochrane Library, Embase, and EBSCO, up to December 1, 2019. Random or fixed effects models for pooled estimates calculation were used and the Meta package of R software was applied. Results Pooled estimates revealed that lesion size decreased by 1.53 cm 2 (95%: 0.71-2.35) after PDT, while partial response (PR) reached 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65–0.85). The visual analog scale score was decreased 3.82 (95%CI:2.80-4.85), and the Thongprasom sign score was decreased 1.33 (95%CI:0.56-2.10) after PDT. Subgroup analyses revealed that the 5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was more effective than methylene blue (MB), with the PR was 0.87 (95%:0.80-0.91). Topical use of 5-ALA can yield better response than gargling methylene blue. In terms of VAS, the diode laser showed better clinic partial response in treatment of OLP. But on changes of lesion size, the efficacy of semiconductor laser is higher than diode laser. And the similar efficacy of PDT with topical corticosteroids was confirmed by pooled estimates of five RCT trials with 139 lesions. Conclusion This systematic review indicates that PDT is an effective treatment modality in the management of OLP. Besides, PDT is as effective as topical corticosteroid in treating OLP and could be used for cases resistant to steroids or when steroids are contraindicated.

“…Some scholars [ 26 ] have supported the hypothesis that PDT stimulates healing processes, which become more evident during long-term observation, particularly within the masticatory mucosa. This tentative hypothesis needs to be confirmed by a greater number of cured cases.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Efficacy evaluation of photodynamic therapy for oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Deng

et al. 2020

BMC Oral Health

Background Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a new option for oral lichen planus (OLP) management; however, there are different opinions on the efficacy of PDT for OLP. The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess the efficacy of PDT in the treatment of OLP and compare PDT with steroid therapy. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the curative effect of PDT. Five electronic databases were searched, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and EBSCO up to 1 December, 2019. Random and fixed effects models for pooled estimates calculation were used and the Meta package of R was applied. Results Pooled estimates revealed that, after PDT, the lesion size decreased by 1.53 cm2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71–2.35) after PDT and the partial response (PR) was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.65–0.85). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score decreased by 3.82 (95% CI: 2.80–4.85) and the Thongprasom sign score decreased by 1.33 (95% CI: 0.56–2.10) after PDT. Subgroup analyses revealed that the 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was more effective than methylene blue (MB), with a PR of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91). The topical use of 5-ALA yielded a better response than gargling methylene blue. In terms of VAS, the diode laser showed a better clinical PR in the treatment of OLP. In terms of changes in lesion size, the efficacy of the semiconductor laser was higher than that of the diode laser. PDT had a similar efficacy to topical corticosteroids, as shown by pooled estimates of five randomised controlled trials with 139 lesions. Conclusion This systematic review indicates that PDT is an effective treatment modality for the management of OLP. PDT is as effective as topical corticosteroid in the treatment of OLP and could be used for cases resistant to steroids or when steroids are contraindicated.