A clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and a giomer restorative material

An eighteen-month clinical evaluation of posterior restorations with fluoride releasing adhesive and composite systems

“…Each F-PRG and S-PRG filler technology has been applied to the self-etch adhesive system and resin composite materials 3,7,8) . The clinically accepted long-term performances of GIOMER products with S-PRG filler, "Beautifil", an aesthetic direct restorative material for anterior and posterior teeth and "FL-Bond", a two-step bonding system, consists of a self etching primer and fluoride releasing bonding agent as previously reported 6) . Recently, improvement on the PRG technology has been developed that resulting in the development of modified "S-PRG filler" which consists of a three-layered structure with an original glass core of multifunctional fluoro-boro-alminosilicate glass and two-surface layers that form a pre-reacted glass-ionomer phase on the surface of a glass core and a reinforced modified layer that covers the surface of pre-reacted glass-ionomer phase -it is important to recognize the modified S-PRG filler is reinforced.…”

“…This PRG technology was applied to the filler component of resin composite materials to provide a bioactive result that released and was recharged with fluoride -like a traditional glassionomer cement-all the while maintaining the original physical properties of the resin composite system 4,5) . This resin composite material with PRG filler technology is totally different from other compomers or resin modified glass-ionomer cements -consequently these new PRG filler containing products are categorized as a giomer 1,4,6) . This concept is based on hybridized technology between PRG filler and resin composite material 3) .…”

Effect of staining solutions on color of pre-reacted glass-ionomer containing composites

“…Matis et al found no significant difference between giomer and micro-filled composite restorations in all the parameters evaluated after 3 years 6) . Gordan et al evaluated the clinical performance of giomer restorations over eight years and reported no restoration failure 7) . Significant changes were, however, observed for marginal adaptation and staining.…”

Giomer yapıdaki akışkan kompozit ve adeziv sistemin Sınıf V kavitelerde mikrosızıntı açısından değerlendirilmesi

“…18,19 Bu kompozit restoratif materyallerle ilgili yapılan çalışmalar incelendiğinde diş dokusuna bağ-lantısı için üretici önerileri doğrultusunda yine florid depolayabilen adeziv sistemlerle birlikte kullanıldığı tespit edilmiştir. [20][21][22] Bu çalışmada ise florid salan ve depolayabilen bu materyallerin geleneksel tipteki kompozit rezin ve adeziv sistemle kombinasyonunun mikrosızın-tı açısından karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi amaçlan-mıştır.…”