2015
DOI: 10.1111/apm.12456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A clinical and molecular review of inverted papilloma of the urinary tract: how to handle?

Abstract: Inverted papilloma (IP) of the urinary tract is classified by the World Health Organisation as a non-invasive urothelial tumour with normal to minimal cytological atypia of the neoplastic cells. During the 1980s, it came under suspicion of having a premalignant or malignant potential and of being concurrent with urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC). This quandary has been proven difficult to solve, due to the fact that IP is very rare and literature mostly consists of case reports with varying levels of information… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Irritative symptoms, as well as urinary tract obstruction, have also been reported [55]. In a high percentage of cases, however, tumours are asymptomatic and detected during unrelated clinical investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Irritative symptoms, as well as urinary tract obstruction, have also been reported [55]. In a high percentage of cases, however, tumours are asymptomatic and detected during unrelated clinical investigations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most tumours measure less than 3 cm in diameter but can reach up to 8 cm or more. They usually occur as solitary lesions, although 3.6-6% are bilateral or multicentric [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPB exhibits slow growth and regular morphology, with its surface being covered by normal urinary tract epithelium and without involving the muscle layer. There, there is no significant difference between the lesion margin and the adjacent bladder wall [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%