2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/784185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Clinical and Confocal Microscopic Comparison of Transepithelial PRK and LASEK for Myopia

Abstract: Purpose. To compare the clinical and confocal microscopic results of transepithelial PRK versus LASEK for correction of myopia. Materials and Methods. Twelve patients with myopia received transepithelial PRK in one eye and LASEK in the other. In transepithelial PRK-treated eyes, the corneal epithelium was removed with 40 microns of excimer laser ablation and in LASEK-treated eyes with 25-second application of 18% ethanol. Time to epithelial healing, ocular discomfort, uncorrected and best corrected visual acu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A greater reduction in keratocyte density was observed under confocal microscopy after transepithelial PRK at 1–3 months. These results implied a more intense wound healing response after transepithelial PRK compared to LASEK [ 14 ]. But compared with traditional PRK, transepithelial PRK has been seen to result in significantly less haze [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A greater reduction in keratocyte density was observed under confocal microscopy after transepithelial PRK at 1–3 months. These results implied a more intense wound healing response after transepithelial PRK compared to LASEK [ 14 ]. But compared with traditional PRK, transepithelial PRK has been seen to result in significantly less haze [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relatively slow visual recovery and early postoperative pain, mostly due to prolonged total duration of epithelial healing, remain the main disadvantages . In our practice, epithelial closure after conventional PRK is completed in three days in most of the cases . Shortening the epithelial healing duration with novel methods may shorten the duration of pain, and decrease other negative aspects of delayed healing, such as risk for haze and infectious keratitis due to a bare epithelial surface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our practice, the duration of epithelial healing was about a day shorter after PRK compared to LASEK . In this study, in addition to testing the effectiveness of AS eye‐drops in epithelial healing after PRK, we intended to develop methods for faster healing following surface ablation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the introduction of LASEK to refractive surgery in recent decades, epithelial flaps have successfully been used in subepithelial keratectomy by covering the excimer laser ablation area to reduce inflammation and scarring caused by photorefractive keratectomy [1113]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%