2017
DOI: 10.5194/hess-2017-192
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Climate Data Record (CDR) for the global terrestrial water budget: 1984–2010

Abstract: Abstract. Closing the terrestrial water budget is necessary to providing consistent estimates of budget components for understanding water resources and changes over time. Given the lack of in-situ observations of budget components at anything but local scale, merging information from multiple data sources (e.g. in-situ observation, satellite remote sensing, land surface model and reanalysis) through data assimilation techniques that optimize the estimation of fluxes is a promising approach. In this study, a s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Jung ET is a monthly 0.5° gridded global data set from 1982 to 2011. The second monthly 0.5° ET data set (1984–2010) was from the global terrestrial water cycle Climate Data Record (CDR; Zhang, Pan, et al, ), which was obtained by combining multiple available data sources for 𝑃, 𝐸𝑇, runoff, and TWSC with enforced water budget closure. The other two ET data sets were from the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS), versions 2.0 and 2.1 (Rodell et al, ), which employed the Noah land surface model at a 0.25° spatial resolution.…”
Section: Study Site and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Jung ET is a monthly 0.5° gridded global data set from 1982 to 2011. The second monthly 0.5° ET data set (1984–2010) was from the global terrestrial water cycle Climate Data Record (CDR; Zhang, Pan, et al, ), which was obtained by combining multiple available data sources for 𝑃, 𝐸𝑇, runoff, and TWSC with enforced water budget closure. The other two ET data sets were from the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS), versions 2.0 and 2.1 (Rodell et al, ), which employed the Noah land surface model at a 0.25° spatial resolution.…”
Section: Study Site and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take the summation of runoff and water storage change (includes groundwater, snowmelt, and soil moisture) of the CDR (Zhang et al, ) for the global terrestrial water budget (spatial resolution: 0.5° × 0.5°, temporal resolution: monthly, and time period: 1984–2010) to represent the baseline water availability (27 years × 12 months = 324 monthly samples). The CDR is an optimized estimation of the terrestrial water budget through merging in situ observations, satellite remote sensing, reanalysis, and land surface model outputs using data assimilation techniques.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CDR is an optimized estimation of the terrestrial water budget through merging in situ observations, satellite remote sensing, reanalysis, and land surface model outputs using data assimilation techniques. The runoff data have been validated against in situ discharge measurements obtained from the Global Runoff Data Centre and the U.S. Geological Survey (Zhang et al, ). The water storage change data were the ensemble mean of that prepared by three centers, GeoForschungsZentrum in Potsdam; Center for Space Research at University of Texas, Austin; and Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Zhang et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monthly global terrestrial water budget was collected from the Terrestrial Hydrology Research Group of Princeton University (Zhang et al, ), and it includes four variables, that is, precipitation, evapotranspiration, runoff, and total water storage change. The period that this data set covers is 1984–2010 with a spatial resolution of 0.5°.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period that this data set covers is 1984–2010 with a spatial resolution of 0.5°. Zhang et al () assimilated this data set by using multisource data such as in situ observations, remotely sensed data, GCM, and reanalysis outputs. The monthly E 0 data set covering a period from 1901 to 2015 with spatial resolution of 0.5° was extracted from CRU TS3.24.01 by the Climatic Research Unit of the University of East Anglia (https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%