2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.108416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification surrogate-assisted multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for expensive optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well-known that the exact fitness values are unnecessary during selection if the binary relation between solutions MOEA/D-EGO [25] K-RVEA [26] ParEGO [31] ... CSEA [47] CSA-MOEA [48] MCEA/D [49] ... RCPS [52] θ-DEA-DP [54] REMO [55] ... can be found. Coincidentally, grid location is one of the ways that can reflect this relation of solutions.…”
Section: B Grid Definition and Grid Dominancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is well-known that the exact fitness values are unnecessary during selection if the binary relation between solutions MOEA/D-EGO [25] K-RVEA [26] ParEGO [31] ... CSEA [47] CSA-MOEA [48] MCEA/D [49] ... RCPS [52] θ-DEA-DP [54] REMO [55] ... can be found. Coincidentally, grid location is one of the ways that can reflect this relation of solutions.…”
Section: B Grid Definition and Grid Dominancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some specific parameters about them are shown in Table I. Apart from that, GCS-PSO is compared with seven state-of-the-art SAEAs, including three regression-based SAEAs (K-RVEA [26], HeE-MOEA [35], and EDN-ARMOEA [40]) and four classification-based SAEAs (CSA-MOEA [48], CSEA [47], MCEA/D [49], and REMO [55]). Each algorithm is conducted on three-objective DTLZ1-DTLZ5 [68] and WFG1-WFG9 [69] benchmark problems with different dimensions of decision variables D = 20, 40, 60, and 80.…”
Section: A Parameter Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therein, most of the operations are carried out at the level of fast surrogates, with costly EM simulations only executed occasionally, to validate the designs produced using the metamodels or to obtain the data necessary for model refinement. Among the two major classes of surrogate modelling methods, the physics-based ones are more often used for local search purposes (space mapping 43 , response correction 44 46 ), whereas data-driven models (kriging 47 , Gaussian process regression, GPR 48 , artificial neural networks 49 51 , support vector regression 52 , polynomial chaos expansion 53 ) are perceived as more generic, and suitable for global and multi-criterial design 54 56 , as well as uncertainty quantification 57 60 . Related methods include machine learning techniques 61 63 , as well as surrogate-assisted frameworks involving variable-resolution models (two-level GPR 64 , co-kriging 65 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%