2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2006.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification of the minimal ring extensions of certain commutative rings

Abstract: All rings considered are commutative with identity and all ring extensions are unital. Let R be a ring with total quotient ring T . The integral minimal ring extensions of R are catalogued via generator-and-relations. If T is von Neumann regular and no maximal ideal of R is a minimal prime ideal of R, the minimal ring extensions of R are classified, up to R-algebra isomorphism, as the minimal overrings (within T ) of R and, for maximal ideals M of R, the idealizations R(+)R/M and the direct products R × R/M. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that other papers by D. E. Dobbs [6], and D. E. Dobbs with P.-J. Cahen, T. G. Lucas [5], J. Shapiro [9], B. Mullins and ourselves [7] also went against the same trend. It is worth noticing here that FCP extensions of integral domains are (ignoring fields) extensions of overrings as a quick look at [5,Theorems 4.1,4.4] shows because FCP extensions are composites of finitely many minimal extensions.…”
Section: Introduction and Notationmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that other papers by D. E. Dobbs [6], and D. E. Dobbs with P.-J. Cahen, T. G. Lucas [5], J. Shapiro [9], B. Mullins and ourselves [7] also went against the same trend. It is worth noticing here that FCP extensions of integral domains are (ignoring fields) extensions of overrings as a quick look at [5,Theorems 4.1,4.4] shows because FCP extensions are composites of finitely many minimal extensions.…”
Section: Introduction and Notationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Note that other papers by D. E. Dobbs [6], and D. E. Dobbs with P.-J. Cahen, T. G. Lucas [5], J. Shapiro [9], B. Mullins and ourselves [7] M is finitely generated, R/C has finitely many ideals and M P is cyclic for any prime ideal P of R containing C such that R/P is infinite.…”
Section: Introduction and Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We remind the reader that if S is a maximal subring of a ring R, then the ring extension S ⊆ R is called a minimal ring extension. This kind of ring extensions are studied first in [15,17,18], and recently in [11][12][13], see also [34]. We summarize some historical and well-known facts from the latter references in Section 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There are many papers in the literature studying maximal subalgebras of an algebra A over a field F (see e.g. [9,10,11,21,22,23] and the references therein), and for commutative rings the related notion of minimal ring extensions has become popular (for this, the papers [6,7,8] are a good starting point). However, less work has been done on classifying the maximal subrings of a general algebra A .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%