2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcta.2019.105174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification of the graphical m-semiregular representation of finite groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observe that every n-PDR is also a DnSR, but not every DnSR is necessarily a n-PDR because it may not be n-partite. Therefore, Theorem 1.1 can be seen as an extension of the classification in [8] of the finite groups admitting a DnSR. The second generalisation we discuss is concerned with Haar digraphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Observe that every n-PDR is also a DnSR, but not every DnSR is necessarily a n-PDR because it may not be n-partite. Therefore, Theorem 1.1 can be seen as an extension of the classification in [8] of the finite groups admitting a DnSR. The second generalisation we discuss is concerned with Haar digraphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Morris and Spiga [13,14,15], answering a question of Babai [1], classified the finite groups admitting an oriented regular representation. For more results, generalising DRRs in various directions, we refer to [7,8,9,12,16,18]. To give some more context to Theorem 1.1, we give details to two more particular generalisations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morris and Spiga [18,19,22], answering a question of Babai [2], have classified the finite groups admitting an oriented regular representation, ORR for short. For more results, generalising the classical DRR and GRR classification in various direction, we refer to [5,7,6,17,23,24,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We say that a group G admits a (di)graphical m-semiregular representation (DmSR and GmSR, for short), if there exists a regular m-Cayley (di)graph Γ over G such that Aut(Γ) ∼ = G. In particular, D1SRs and G1SRs are the usual GRRs and DRRs. For each m ∈ N, we have classified in [6] the finite groups admitting a DmSR and the finite groups admitting a GmSR. In this paper we propose a natural variant of this problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%