“…This type of system has a higher equipment cost (Daganzo and Blumenfeld, 1994) but is both more reliable and more flexible (Rekiek et al, 2002;Becker and Scholl, 2006;Chiang et al, 2007) and allows for better balances, reducing the total number of required stations (Chiang et al, 2007). It also increases productivity (Chakravarty and Shtub, 1988;Boysen et al, 2006;Chiang et al, 2007), worker satisfaction and product quality (Ellegard and Jonsson, 1992). This type of system raises new problems regarding the number of assembly lines that should be opened, their characteristics (the number of stations and the cycle time) and the assignment of products and workers to the lines, in addition to the standard problem of balancing each assembly line (i.e., to determine, if necessary, the number of stations, and to assign tasks to stations).…”