IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004 2004
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2004.1308106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A classification of 3R orthogonal manipulators by the topology of their workspace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the number of cusp points stabilizes to four, defining one central foursolution region surrounded by a two-solution region (L 1 =31, …). Interestingly, this last pattern is very similar to the one often observed in a cross-section of the workspace of 3-R serial manipulators [13]. However, serial manipulators feature the same pattern in all cross-sections (the sections which passes through the first revolute joint axis), and variation in the number of cusp points arises only from a modification of the manipulator geometry.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Finally, the number of cusp points stabilizes to four, defining one central foursolution region surrounded by a two-solution region (L 1 =31, …). Interestingly, this last pattern is very similar to the one often observed in a cross-section of the workspace of 3-R serial manipulators [13]. However, serial manipulators feature the same pattern in all cross-sections (the sections which passes through the first revolute joint axis), and variation in the number of cusp points arises only from a modification of the manipulator geometry.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysissupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The first factor defines two horizontal lines in the joint space (assuming d 3 ≤d 4 , which is the case for the manipulator in An interesting classification criterion is the topology of the singular curves in the cross section of the workspace. A way of defining the topology of these curves is to enumerate their singular points, the cusp points and the node points [14,16].…”
Section: C D R S S D S R C C R R D S S C Jmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of [7] was completed in [8] to take into account additional features in the classification like genericity and the number of aspects. [9] established a classification of 3R orthogonal manipulators with no offset on their last joint, based on the work of [8], according to the number of cusps and node points, the parameters space was divided into 9 cells where the manipulators have the same number of cusps and nodes in their workspace. [9] classified only the family of 3R orthogonal manipulators with no offset on their last joint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be shown that the elements of the third level of determinants depend quadratically on s 3,7 and s 4,7 . Then, since the two outer levels of determinants are quadratic with respect to their elements, the singularity locus can be displayed as a curve of order 2 3 in the plane defined by s 3,7 and s 4,7 .…”
Section: Singularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symbolic condition, in terms of the DH parameters of the robot, for this polynomial to have three equal roots has been considered as intractable [1]. Only the case of orthogonal 3R robots -robots whose consecutive joint axes are mutually orthogonal-has been analyzed in detail [4]. This paper puts forward a new formulation of the problem that could lead to new insights into Federico Thomas Institut de Robòtica i Informàtica Industrial (CSIC-UPC) e-mail: fthomas@iri.upc.edu the general case thanks to the simplicity and symmetry of the resulting algebraic expressions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%