1999
DOI: 10.1080/00927879908826745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A class of noncommutative and noncocommutative hopf algebras: the quantum version

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we have H n p q ∼ = H n 1 q ∼ = D A n q −1 for any p = 0. For details, the reader can see [3,4]. Thus in order to discuss the representations of D A n q −1 , we only have to consider the representations of H n 1 q .…”
Section: Almost Split Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, we have H n p q ∼ = H n 1 q ∼ = D A n q −1 for any p = 0. For details, the reader can see [3,4]. Thus in order to discuss the representations of D A n q −1 , we only have to consider the representations of H n 1 q .…”
Section: Almost Split Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the previous papers [3,4], we constructed an infinite-dimensional noncommutative and noncocommutative Hopf algebra H p q for any p q ∈ k with q = 0, where k is a fixed field. When q is a root of the nth cyclotomic polynomial over Z, H p q has an n 4 -dimensional quotient Hopf algebra H n p q .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Drinfeld doubles of Taft's Hopf algebras and their finite representations were investigated in [5][6][7][8]. Let us recall some results which we need throughout the paper.…”
Section: Drinfeld Double Of Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we may assume 1 ∈ 2V (1, 0) as the identity 1 generates a copy of V (1, 0). Thus we may choose a linear basis {x 1 , x 2 , x 3 , 1} for A such that {x 1 , x 2 } is a canonical basis for M 1 (1, 0, ∞) with the D 4 -action given by (5) and 2V (1, 0) 4 . Replacing x 3 with x 3 + α for some suitable α ∈ k, we may assume…”
Section: Proof Without Loss Of Generality We Assumementioning
confidence: 99%