2015
DOI: 10.1002/mmce.20905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A circular patch antenna with parasitic element for UHF RFID applications

Abstract: This article initially proposes a directly‐fed circular patch antenna with L‐shaped ground plane for Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) applications in the 900 MHz (902−928 MHz) ultrahigh frequency (UHF) band. To achieve circularly polarized (CP) radiation, two arc‐shaped notches are loaded into the main patch. To enhance the CP bandwidth so that the proposed antenna can also cover the UHF RFID band for Europe (866−869 MHz), a parasitic element is printed besides the main patch. Experimental measurements sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table I shows the comparison between proposed CP patch antenna, Refs. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], and those that are available commercially in the open market that operate at 865 2 956 MHz [9, 10]. By studying this table, the CP bandwidth and peak gain of proposed antenna are compatible with those reported in [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table I shows the comparison between proposed CP patch antenna, Refs. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], and those that are available commercially in the open market that operate at 865 2 956 MHz [9, 10]. By studying this table, the CP bandwidth and peak gain of proposed antenna are compatible with those reported in [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Furthermore, unlike [6] that required a parasitic planar area of 30% over the main square patch, this parasitic element has a small planar area of only 7.8% over the main circular patch. Notably, the design of this work is an extension from [8], in which the parasitic element when added into the radiating patch only gives a CP bandwidth of (865 2 946 MHz) that does not satisfy the Universal RFID band. Furthermore, the parasitic element in this work is also much smaller than [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several types of LP UHF tag antennas, such as dipole, patch, and inverted F-antennas, have been studied. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] In this study, the proposed LP tag received only half of the power transmitted by the CP reader antenna because of polarization mismatch. Theoretically, a half-power (3-dB) variation can change the reading range by approximately 41%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several types of LP UHF tag antennas, such as dipole, patch, and inverted F‐antennas, have been studied . In this study, the proposed LP tag received only half of the power transmitted by the CP reader antenna because of polarization mismatch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%