2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02397-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chromosome-level genome assembly of a deep-sea starfish (Zoroaster cf. ophiactis)

Abstract: Understanding of adaptation and evolution of organisms in the deep sea requires more genomic resources. Zoroaster cf. ophiactis is a sea star in the family Zoroasteridae occurring exclusively in the deep sea. In this study, a chromosome-level genome assembly for Z. cf. ophiactis was generated by combining Nanopore long-read, Illumina short-read, and Hi-C sequencing data. The final assembly was 1,002.0 Mb in length, with a contig N50 of 376 Kb and a scaffold N50 of 40.4 Mb, and included 22 pseudo-chromosomes, c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that, among Eleutherozoa, sea cucumbers and sea stars show the strongest conservation of ancestral bilaterian linkage groups, whereas the brittle star genome is highly reshuffled relative to the Bilaterian ancestor. Examination of additional sea stars and sea urchins genomes suggest that these trends might broadly extend to species within their respective classes ((Davidson et al 2023; Liu et al 2023; Marlétaz et al 2023); Figure S3 ), but, given the limited sampling, this should be re-examined as more chromosome-scale genome assemblies become available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate that, among Eleutherozoa, sea cucumbers and sea stars show the strongest conservation of ancestral bilaterian linkage groups, whereas the brittle star genome is highly reshuffled relative to the Bilaterian ancestor. Examination of additional sea stars and sea urchins genomes suggest that these trends might broadly extend to species within their respective classes ((Davidson et al 2023; Liu et al 2023; Marlétaz et al 2023); Figure S3 ), but, given the limited sampling, this should be re-examined as more chromosome-scale genome assemblies become available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…63 , Asterias rubens 64 , Patiria miniata 65 , Plazaster borealis 66 , and Zoroaster cf. ophiactis 67 were utilized to identify orthologous groups using OrthoFinder (v2.5.5) 68 with the parameters ‘-S diamond’, and the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus 69 was selected as an outgroup. A total of 5,315 single-copy orthogroups were obtained for subsequent phylogenetic analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%