2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.03.02.482245
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chromosome-level genome assembly enables the identification of the follicle stimulating hormone receptor as the master sex determining gene in Solea senegalensis

Abstract: Sex determination (SD) mechanisms are exceptionally diverse and show high evolutionary rates in fish. Pleuronectiformes is an emblematic fish group characterized by its adaptation to demersal life and its compact genomes. Here, we present a chromosome-level genome assembly of Senegalese sole, a promising European aquaculture species. We combined long- and short-read sequencing and a highly dense genetic map to obtain a contiguous assembly of 613 Mb (N50 = 29.0 Mb, 99% of the assembly in the n = 21 chromosomes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(145 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent chromosome orthology has been recently reported within flatfishes taking advantage of their chromosome‐level genome assemblies facilitated by their compact genomes (de la Herrán et al, 2022; Jasonowicz et al, 2022; Lü et al, 2021; Martínez et al, 2021). According to this information, the SD gene‐bearing chromosome of S. senegalensis , Sse C12, would not be orthologous to any other consistently proven SD chromosome in flatfish species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Consistent chromosome orthology has been recently reported within flatfishes taking advantage of their chromosome‐level genome assemblies facilitated by their compact genomes (de la Herrán et al, 2022; Jasonowicz et al, 2022; Lü et al, 2021; Martínez et al, 2021). According to this information, the SD gene‐bearing chromosome of S. senegalensis , Sse C12, would not be orthologous to any other consistently proven SD chromosome in flatfish species.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Previous studies on allozyme variation in the turbot supported much lower variation for this fraction of protein coding genes than in other flatfishes (~ fivefold lower), unlike the very similar diversity observed with microsatellites, which was interpreted as an ancient bottleneck in this species 11 . If this observation could be extrapolated to all protein coding genes, this would mean that a much higher NSV would occur in other flatfish, which is supported by the ~ 10 million SNPs detected in Senegalese sole vs ~ 3 million SNPs in turbot obtained from the recent whole genome resequencing of 12 sole individuals 86 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…If this observation could be extrapolated to all protein coding genes, this would mean that a much higher NSV would occur in other flatfish, which is supported by the ~ 10 million SNPs detected in Senegalese sole vs ~ 3 million SNPs in turbot obtained from the recent whole genome resequencing of 12 sole individuals 86 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The common cockle genetic map here constructed comprehends 13,874 markers with an inter-marker distance of 0.16 cM and comprises the 19 expected LGs matching with the haploid karyotype of the species (Insua & Thiriot-Quiévreux, 1991), being, to our knowledge, the denser genetic map published to date in molluscs. Besides its importance for genomic screening, the common cockle genetic map is an invaluable tool for genome scaffolding, as has been previously reported in other species (Martínez et al, 2021; de la Herrán et al, 2022), and in fact, five of the seven mollusc genomes assembled at chromosome-level took advantage of high-density linkage maps (Hollenbeck & Johnston, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GBS methods have been recently applied to understand adaptive variation of common cockle from Northeast Atlantic, and consistent signals of adaptive variation were detected both at microgeographic (dd-RAD; Coscia et al, 2020) and macrogeographic (2b-RAD; Vera et al, 2022) scales. GBS have facilitated the construction of high-resolution linkage maps (Maroso et al, 2018; Dong et al, 2019; de la Herrán et al, 2022), which are important tools for genome scaffolding and assembly (Fierst, 2015), and have aided to disentangle the genetic basis of relevant evolutionary or productive traits through quantitative trait locus (QTL) screening (Aslam et al, 2020; Yin & Hedgecock, 2021). Genetic maps have been used to study the genetic architecture of traits of interest in various bivalve species, such as growth in Zhikong scallop ( Chlamys farreri ; Zhan et al, 2009), bay scallop ( Argopecten irradians ; Li et al, 2012) or Crassostrea gigas (Li et al, 2018), various pearl-quality traits in triangle sail mussel ( Hyriopsis cumingii ; Bai et al, 2016) and resistance to pathologies (Harrang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%