1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf02260283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chromatographic response function for automated optimization of separations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This parameter is commonly used as the optimization criterion to compare selectivity in the chosen TLC systems [12, 21]. Individual micro-TLC chromatographic profiles composed of multiple spots were compared using Δ hR F product (ΠΔ hR F ) similarly to optimization criteria proposed for column chromatography [22, 23]. In the present work logarithmic form of Δ hR F product was applied due to wide (few factors) range of resulting ΠΔ hR F values calculated for the spots visualized in studied samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parameter is commonly used as the optimization criterion to compare selectivity in the chosen TLC systems [12, 21]. Individual micro-TLC chromatographic profiles composed of multiple spots were compared using Δ hR F product (ΠΔ hR F ) similarly to optimization criteria proposed for column chromatography [22, 23]. In the present work logarithmic form of Δ hR F product was applied due to wide (few factors) range of resulting ΠΔ hR F values calculated for the spots visualized in studied samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of chromatography has been applied for over 40 years to improving separations of solution components (1, 2) and to the dependence of degree of separation on column efficiency and selectivity (2)(3)(4). Most measures of the degree of separation have been limited to peaks of Gaussian (1,2,5) or similar shapes (6)(7)(8)(9). Non-Gaussian peak shapes obtained in chromatographic systems with nonlinear isotherms or slow retention kinetics sometimes result from unavoidable system conditions such as slow protein diffusion, low stationary-phase capacity, or stationary-phase inhomogeneity.…”
Section: Citedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other work Schoenmakers offers firstorder corrections to Ra for the effects of a very large interfering peak (16). The peak separations of Kaiser (17) and related measures (7,8) are very useful to describe the degree of separation for Gaussian peak shapes, but their usefulness is not easily extended to peaks with radically non-Gaussian shapes. The linear algebraic methods of Corry et al (18) are designed to measure the efficiency of a single sorting process.…”
Section: Citedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wegscheider et al (6) developed a response function that operates differently than those mentioned above, i.e., as a product rather than a summation, and it takes into account the noise level of the chromatogram. In addition, there have also been peak-counting algorithms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, peak crossing causes problems since the function is zero for totally overlapped pairs of peaks, causing false optima. The function of Wegscheider et al (6), even though it operates as a product of the individual peak separations rather than the sum of natural logarithms, suffers from the same problems. Furthermore, for all of the above functions, the number of components being separated should be known in order to ensure proper operation of the function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%