2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2022.123554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chromatographic and immunoprofiling approach to optimising workflows for extraction of gluten proteins from flour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the supernatant was collected, dried with nitrogen gas at 40°C, and redissolved in 10 mL ethanol-H 2 O solution (1:9, v: v) to obtain the final solution to be tested. The extraction process of other proteins in flour mainly refers to previous research methods ( Daly et al, 2022 ). The difference in color and ΔR of each food sample extraction solution was recorded in the aptasensor (ΔR = R-R 0 , R is the absorbance ratio of each food sample extract in the aptasensor, and R 0 is the absorbance ratio of the blank solution).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the supernatant was collected, dried with nitrogen gas at 40°C, and redissolved in 10 mL ethanol-H 2 O solution (1:9, v: v) to obtain the final solution to be tested. The extraction process of other proteins in flour mainly refers to previous research methods ( Daly et al, 2022 ). The difference in color and ΔR of each food sample extraction solution was recorded in the aptasensor (ΔR = R-R 0 , R is the absorbance ratio of each food sample extract in the aptasensor, and R 0 is the absorbance ratio of the blank solution).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%