2024
DOI: 10.1049/rsn2.12587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chirplet‐based masking algorithm for smeared spectrum jamming suppression and signal separation

Yifan Wang,
Yibing Li,
Gang Yu
et al.

Abstract: Linear frequency modulation (LFM) signal is a common radar signal in modern electronic warfare, and smeared spectrum (SMSP) can generate multiple false targets, causing jamming to radar detection. The authors propose a chirplet‐based masking algorithm that can solve the problem of SMSP jamming suppression and address a more complex problem: the separation of jamming signal and multiple LFM signals from intercepted mixed signal. First, the authors obtain matched chirp rates of the source signals through the cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The widespread adoption of digital radio frequency memory (DRFM) [5,6] has given rise to interference techniques such as smeared spectrum (SMSP) [7,8], interrupted sampling repeater jamming (ISRJ) [9,10], and interrupted non-uniform sampling repeater jamming (INUSRJ) [11,12]. These methods generate numerous false targets near the actual target by retransmitting the intercepted radar signal segments, which poses a significant threat to radar detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread adoption of digital radio frequency memory (DRFM) [5,6] has given rise to interference techniques such as smeared spectrum (SMSP) [7,8], interrupted sampling repeater jamming (ISRJ) [9,10], and interrupted non-uniform sampling repeater jamming (INUSRJ) [11,12]. These methods generate numerous false targets near the actual target by retransmitting the intercepted radar signal segments, which poses a significant threat to radar detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%