2018
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Chinese herbal medicine preparation (Pei Tu Qing Xin) for children with moderate-to-severe atopic eczema: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2015, we reported the results of an assessor-blind, multicentre RCT of PTQX for the treatment of AD [9, 29]. Still, the molecular mechanism underlying the effects of PTQX against AD urgently requires attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, we reported the results of an assessor-blind, multicentre RCT of PTQX for the treatment of AD [9, 29]. Still, the molecular mechanism underlying the effects of PTQX against AD urgently requires attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine the effects of including only study of low risk of bias; and that of using the change of score from the baseline rather than post-intervention scores on the pooled results. The only study of low risk of bias (Gu 2018) [14] reported no signi cant difference was found between the ICWM and WM alone groups in terms of EASI change. When the change of score from baseline was used, with the missing SD of EASI imputed from gures report in Gu 2018 and that of SCORAD imputed from Chen 2016, ICWM was still superior to WM alone ( SCORAD: MD =-8.15, 95% CI -12.89 to -3.41; EASI: MD =-2.59, 95% CI -4.48 to -0.70).…”
Section: Primary Outcomementioning
confidence: 96%
“…About a third of included studies described their ways of generating a random sequence and thus had low risk of bias in this domain. Only 3 studies described the allocation concealment method [14,17,19]. Five studies took measures to blind participants, study personnel and outcome assessors [14,16,17,19,21].…”
Section: Risk Of Bias Within Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations