2021
DOI: 10.1590/s1517-707620210002.1284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chemical patterning approach of dense and porous titanium surfaces by using a combination of concentrated acid and oxidant

Abstract: Commercially dense pure titanium sheets and porous titanium samples processed by powder metallurgy were treated with a mixture consisting of equal volumes of H 2 SO 4 and H 2 O 2 for 2 or 4 hours. Characterization was performed by scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, confocal scanning optical microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The analyses showed that the chemical patterning approach using a combination of concentrated acid and oxidant was able t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although oxygen is a α-Ti phase stabilizer, its presence in the initial powders did not harm β-Ti phase stabilization, as observed in Figure 6. However, the presence of oxide layer on metal implant surface enhances the biocompatibility and kinetics of the bone formation process, because it avoids or reduce the diffusion of Ti or Nb ions from the bulk metal [43]. The phase composition of samples determined by Rietveld refinement is shown in Table 4.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although oxygen is a α-Ti phase stabilizer, its presence in the initial powders did not harm β-Ti phase stabilization, as observed in Figure 6. However, the presence of oxide layer on metal implant surface enhances the biocompatibility and kinetics of the bone formation process, because it avoids or reduce the diffusion of Ti or Nb ions from the bulk metal [43]. The phase composition of samples determined by Rietveld refinement is shown in Table 4.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher Ra and standard deviation values exhibited by MA sample are related to the presence of macropores on the surface, which makes the roughness profile more heterogenous. Both samples presented suitable surface roughness parameters for bone implant applications, since studies have demonstrated that surfaces with Ra > 10 µm are able to help in initial implant stability and improve osseointegration [43]. Further, large surface roughness favors the adhesion of bioceramic coatings deposited on metal substrates [18].…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd)mentioning
confidence: 99%