2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1115885108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chemical-genetic screen to unravel the genetic network of CDC28/CDK1 links ubiquitin and Rad6–Bre1 to cell cycle progression

Abstract: Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) control the eukaryotic cell cycle, and a single CDK, Cdc28 (also known as Cdk1), is necessary and sufficient for cell cycle regulation in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cdc28 regulates cell cycle-dependent processes such as transcription, DNA replication and repair, and chromosome segregation. To gain further insight into the functions of Cdc28, we performed a high-throughput chemical-genetic array (CGA) screen aimed at unraveling the genetic network of CDC28. We id… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(43 reference statements)
5
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2E). Intriguingly, most of these biological functions have been reported by others (9,12,15,(19)(20)(21)(22), further validating the data from our mass spectrometry analysis and the related assays. However, when cells were irradiated with X rays, there was an obvious functional shift of the interaction networks of the RAD6A interaction partners.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…2E). Intriguingly, most of these biological functions have been reported by others (9,12,15,(19)(20)(21)(22), further validating the data from our mass spectrometry analysis and the related assays. However, when cells were irradiated with X rays, there was an obvious functional shift of the interaction networks of the RAD6A interaction partners.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…These discoveries are supported by report in the biomedical literature (Hartman et al, 2009;Zimmermann et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Since the cdc28-as mutant is reduced by sixfold in overall in vitro activity in the absence of inhibitor (Bishop et al 2000), we surmise that the loss of Abp1p phosphorylation in the doublemutant strain is the result of simultaneous partial reduction in the activity of both kinases. We show here that the pho85-as mutant is definitely inhibited further by addition of 1NM-PP1 (Supporting Information, Figure S1), and the specific inhibition of the cdc28-as mutant by this compound has been previously demonstrated (Bishop et al 2000;Zimmermann et al 2011).…”
Section: Cdc28p and Pho85p Phosphorylate Abp1pmentioning
confidence: 86%