2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1799688/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A chemical defense deters cannibalism in migratory locusts

Abstract: Many animals engage in cannibalism to supplement their diets. In swarms of migratory locusts, cannibalism is prevalent and thought to be an important factor for swarm dynamics. We show that in dense swarms, locusts defend themselves by producing an anti-cannibalistic pheromone; phenylacetonitrile (PAN). Both the degree of cannibalism and the production of PAN are density dependent and co-vary. We identify the olfactory receptor responsible for the detection of PAN, and by using genome editing we show that by m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, this raises an important question as to whether the evolutionary consequences of intra and inter‐specific predation and the respective defence strategies against them that animals use are the same or are they really different. Given that there is some evidence that animals can use the same chemical compound in defence against both intra‐ and inter‐specific predators (Hansson et al, 2022; Wei et al, 2019), this question warrants further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this raises an important question as to whether the evolutionary consequences of intra and inter‐specific predation and the respective defence strategies against them that animals use are the same or are they really different. Given that there is some evidence that animals can use the same chemical compound in defence against both intra‐ and inter‐specific predators (Hansson et al, 2022; Wei et al, 2019), this question warrants further research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%