1943
DOI: 10.2134/agronj1943.00021962003500110005x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Chart for Evaluating Agricultural Limestone1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baker, Phillipsburg, N.J.). These designations represented the bulk particle size of each material (Schollenberger and Salter, 1943). For example, 60% of ground limestone will pass through a 250-µm (#60) screen, 60% of pulverized limestone will pass through a 150-µm (#100) screen, 60% of superfine limestone will pass through a 75-µm (#200) screen, and 99% of microfine limestone will pass through a 45-µm (#325) screen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baker, Phillipsburg, N.J.). These designations represented the bulk particle size of each material (Schollenberger and Salter, 1943). For example, 60% of ground limestone will pass through a 250-µm (#60) screen, 60% of pulverized limestone will pass through a 150-µm (#100) screen, 60% of superfine limestone will pass through a 75-µm (#200) screen, and 99% of microfine limestone will pass through a 45-µm (#325) screen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liming materials are added to container root media with acidic peats to increase pH to a level more acceptable for growth (Nelson, 1991;Peterson, 1981;Warncke and Krauskopf, 1983;Williams et al, 1988b). The particle size and incorporation rate of the limestone influence the pH attained at equilibrium (Chapin, 1980;Gibaly and Axley, 1955;Schollenberger and Salter, 1943;Sheldrake, 1980;Williams et al, 1988b). Some information about the differences in lime requirements of certain peats is also available (Argo and Biernbaum, 1994;Lucas et al, 1975;Puustjarvi and Robertson, 1975;Rosenbaum and Sartain, 1982), as is information about the rate of reaction of lime (Williams et al, 1988b) and the effect of water alkalinity in conjunction with lime (Williams et al, 1988a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating sufficient lime into a soilless root medium to obtain an initial pH range of 5.5 to 6.4 is recommended (Nelson, 1991;Peterson, 1981;Warncke and Krauskopf, 1983). The amount of liming material required to obtain an equilibrium pH of 6 in the root medium depends on the incorporation rate and particle size (Argo and Biernbaum, 1996;Chapin, 1980;Gibaly and Axley, 1955;Schollenberger and Salter, 1943;Sheldrake, 1980;Williams et al, 1988b) as well as the surface area of the liming material (Parfitt and Ellis, 1966). There is some information about the time required for the lime to reach a stable pH in soilless medium (Argo and Biernbaum, 1996;Williams et al, 1988b), the effect of water alkalinity in conjunction with lime in unplanted pots (Williams et al, 1988a), and the water-soluble Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ concentrations that can be expected from the incorporation of dolomitic lime into a soilless medium (Argo and Biernbaum, 1996;Warncke and Krauskopf, 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liming responses to dolomite in this research were essentially completed within 14 days, rather than in months, as is common in mineral soils. The dolomite used would be considered " pulverized" according to the classification system of Schollenber- ger and Salter (14). For purposes of comparison, dolomite of this degree of fineness achieved 60% efficiency in 3 months and 85% efficiency in 1 year when incorporated to plow depth in Ohio agricultural soils.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%