2012
DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2012.54024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A charge of the erythrocyte test by automated method

Abstract: New methods of an automated evaluation of the blood rheological parameters: 1) the viscosity, 2) electric conductivity and 3) the charge of erythrocytes have been theoretically and experimentally substantiated by way of registering the Q-factor of the tuned-circuit, containing a capillary with the blood flow. A design of an electronic measuring complex is based on modeling the physical blood conditions in the natural environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the first and third terms are proportional to the electric field intensity. Using general blood parameters ( Q = −3.19 × 10 −10 C, r = 2.70 × 10 −6 m, η = 1.58 × 10 −3 Pa·s, ζw = −15.7 × 10 −3 V) [Gudmundsson and Bjelle, 1993; Gutsul et al, 2012; Tokumasu et al, 2012; Zhbanov and Yang, 2015], the ratio of μ EP to μ EO is estimated as on the order of 10 6 . In other words, the mobility of electrophoresis is much greater than that of electroosmosis.…”
Section: Movement Of Rbcs In An Electric Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the first and third terms are proportional to the electric field intensity. Using general blood parameters ( Q = −3.19 × 10 −10 C, r = 2.70 × 10 −6 m, η = 1.58 × 10 −3 Pa·s, ζw = −15.7 × 10 −3 V) [Gudmundsson and Bjelle, 1993; Gutsul et al, 2012; Tokumasu et al, 2012; Zhbanov and Yang, 2015], the ratio of μ EP to μ EO is estimated as on the order of 10 6 . In other words, the mobility of electrophoresis is much greater than that of electroosmosis.…”
Section: Movement Of Rbcs In An Electric Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the high conductivity in vivo, extremely large gradients in electric field are unlikely in a living body. Therefore, under general blood parameters ( Q = −3.19 × 10 −10 [C], r = 2.70 × 10 −6 [m], η = 1.58 × 10 −3 [Pa・s]) (Gudmundsson & Bjelle, 1993; Gutsul et al, 2012; Tokumasu et al, 2012; Zhbanov & Yang, 2015), the electrophoresis is overwhelmingly large. Therefore, electrophoresis is regarded as dominant under DC electric field exposure.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysis Of Rbc Movement In An Electric Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%