2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2014.10.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A characterization of the 2-fusion system of L4(q)

Abstract: We study a saturated fusion system F on a finite 2-group S having a Baumann component based on a dihedral 2-group. Assuming F = O 2 (F ), O 2 (F ) = 1, and the centralizer of the component is a cyclic 2-group, it is shown that F is uniquely determined as the 2-fusion system of L 4 (q 1 ) for some q 1 ≡ 3 (mod 4). This should be viewed as a contribution to a program recently outlined by M. Aschbacher for the classification of simple fusion systems at the prime 2. The corresponding problem in the component-type … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and one sees that Q = C S (K) by combining Lemma 1.12(c) of [Lyn15] with Lemma 3.7(c) below. However, O 2 (C) is normal and self-centralizing in C C (K) by properties of the generalized Fitting subgroup, so that C C (K)/O 2 (C) is a group of outer automorphisms of the cyclic 2-group O 2 (C), and so is itself a 2-group.…”
Section: Background On Fusion Systemsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and one sees that Q = C S (K) by combining Lemma 1.12(c) of [Lyn15] with Lemma 3.7(c) below. However, O 2 (C) is normal and self-centralizing in C C (K) by properties of the generalized Fitting subgroup, so that C C (K)/O 2 (C) is a group of outer automorphisms of the cyclic 2-group O 2 (C), and so is itself a 2-group.…”
Section: Background On Fusion Systemsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In this paper, we classify saturated 2-fusion systems having a J-component isomorphic to the 2-fusion system of M 23 , J 3 , McL, or Ly under the assumption that the centralizer of the component is a cyclic 2-group. A similar problem for the fusion system of L 2 (q), q ≡ ±1 (mod 8) was treated in [Lyn15] under stronger hypotheses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To the extent that history is a guide, Theorem TL should serve as a key ingredient in the analysis of simple fusion systems at the prime 2, especially in the component-type portion of a program for the classification of simple 2-fusion systems outlined recently by Aschbacher et al; see [2,. Indeed, we postpone applications of Theorem TL to the companion [11], where we classify certain 2-fusion systems with an involution centralizer having a component based on a dihedral 2-group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the fusion system version of a standard component of type SL 2 q , q odd. For another instance of work in support of this program, see the work of Lynd [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%