1993
DOI: 10.1016/0166-218x(93)90107-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A characterization of overlap-free morphisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A simpler proof of this theorem has been given by Berstel and Se e bold in [1]. Define a morphism to be overlap-free if and only if the image of any overlap-free word is itself overlap-free.…”
Section: The Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A simpler proof of this theorem has been given by Berstel and Se e bold in [1]. Define a morphism to be overlap-free if and only if the image of any overlap-free word is itself overlap-free.…”
Section: The Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Thue [11] proved in 1912 that the only binary overlap-free morphisms are + k and E b + k , with k 0, where + is the morphism defined by +(0)=01 and +(1)=10, and E the morphism defined by E(0)=1 and E(1)=0. The proof of Berstel and Se e bold in [1] consists in first showing that if a morphism h has the property that the word h(01101001) is overlap-free, then the morphism h is either equal to + k or to E b + k for some k 0. Thue's result can easily be deduced from this theorem.…”
Section: The Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus w is a test word if {w} is a test set. It has been shown [BS93] that abbabaab is a test word for overlap-free morphisms. We refer to [RS99] and [RW02b] for a detailed study of test words in various cases.…”
Section: Test Sets and Test Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%