2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6698(03)00054-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A characterization of Grassmann and attenuated spaces as (0,α)-geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From arguments similar as in [15] (see also [2]) it follows that the geometry is uniquely defined and hence that is isomorphic to H q (m, d).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…From arguments similar as in [15] (see also [2]) it follows that the geometry is uniquely defined and hence that is isomorphic to H q (m, d).…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The transversals of the lines in R form another regulus R • , the so-called opposite regulus, which covers the same set of (q + 1) 2 points as R. In a similar vein, we call a set of q + 1 pairwise skew lines in PG(4, q) a regulus if they span a PG(3, q) and form a regulus in their span. For q = 2 things simplify: A regulus in PG (3,2) is just a set of three pairwise skew lines, and a regulus in PG(4, 2) is a set of three pairwise skew lines spanning a solid (3-flat). Now suppose that S forms a partial line spread of size 9 in PG(4, 2).…”
Section: Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lines L i have a unique transversal line L (the intersection of the three solids 7 In PG(4, 2)/L ∼ = PG(2, 2) the solids H 1 , H 2 , H 3 form the sides of a triangle. Hence there exist a unique plane E and a unique solid H 4 in PG (4,2) such that…”
Section: Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations