1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf01222542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A characterization of compact linear mappings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this theorem we are able to prove the following characterization of compact bilinear operators and this extends a characterization of compact linear operators due to Terzioglu [9]; see also Randtke [6]. THEOREM 2.7 For T E BL(X x Y; Z ) the following are equivalent 1" T is compact 2" There exist continuous bilinear functionals 4, on X x Y with lirnl/4,l/ = 0, such that for all (x, y) E X x Y…”
Section: Theorem 26 S E Bl(x X I: 2) Then S Is Compact If and Only mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…With this theorem we are able to prove the following characterization of compact bilinear operators and this extends a characterization of compact linear operators due to Terzioglu [9]; see also Randtke [6]. THEOREM 2.7 For T E BL(X x Y; Z ) the following are equivalent 1" T is compact 2" There exist continuous bilinear functionals 4, on X x Y with lirnl/4,l/ = 0, such that for all (x, y) E X x Y…”
Section: Theorem 26 S E Bl(x X I: 2) Then S Is Compact If and Only mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This follows because K is idempotent and has the Hahn-Banach Extension property. The latter statement is a consequence of a well-known theorem of Terzioglu [14] on the characterisation of compact operators on Banach spaces. The above corollary, therefore, yields a simpler and a more general approach to the construction of universal generators for Schwartz spaces.…”
Section: Corollariesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Remark. Compact linear operators having representations of the form described in Theorem 3(a) have been studied by Terzioglu [8] and [9], and independently by the author [6]. By using the results of [6] it is easy to see that Theorem 3 remains valid if the hypothesis, that £ be a Fréchet space, is replaced by the weaker hypothesis that £be a sequentially complete locally convex space satisfying any one of the conditions of [6, 2.12].…”
Section: Proof (A) Implies (B) Is Clear (B) Implies (D)mentioning
confidence: 91%