2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.12.19.521028
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A characterization of cardiac-induced noise in R2* maps of the brain

Abstract: Purpose Cardiac pulsation increases the noise level in brain maps of the MRI parameter R2*. Cardiac-induced noise is challenging to mitigate during the acquisition of R2* mapping data because the characteristics of this noise remain largely unknown. In this work, we characterize cardiac-induced noise in brain maps of the MRI parameter R2*. Methods We introduce a sampling strategy that enables the acquisition of multi-echo data in several intervals of the cardiac cycle. From this data, we estimate the variabili… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial results indicate that these strategies provide a much improved mitigation of cardiac-induced noise. 64 The spatial resolution in the assessment of the proposed mitigation strategy was higher than the 5D datasets used for the characterization of cardiac-induced noise, leading to a higher contribution of thermal noise to the overall variability of R 2 * maps. Furthermore, cardiac gating was set to act on a restricted area of k-space that contains ∼40% of the total cardiac-induced noise in brain voxels and ∼25% in non-brain voxels, leaving a large part of cardiac-induced noise in other k-space regions intact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initial results indicate that these strategies provide a much improved mitigation of cardiac-induced noise. 64 The spatial resolution in the assessment of the proposed mitigation strategy was higher than the 5D datasets used for the characterization of cardiac-induced noise, leading to a higher contribution of thermal noise to the overall variability of R 2 * maps. Furthermore, cardiac gating was set to act on a restricted area of k-space that contains ∼40% of the total cardiac-induced noise in brain voxels and ∼25% in non-brain voxels, leaving a large part of cardiac-induced noise in other k-space regions intact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We are currently investigating alternative strategies that involve the synchronization of data acquisition with cardiac pulsation for Cartesian trajectories, as well as alternative sampling trajectories. Initial results indicate that these strategies provide a much improved mitigation of cardiac‐induced noise 64 . The spatial resolution in the assessment of the proposed mitigation strategy was higher than the 5D datasets used for the characterization of cardiac‐induced noise, leading to a higher contribution of thermal noise to the overall variability of R 2 * maps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a surrogate for the noise level on the R 2 * estimates, we evaluated the RMS error (RMSE) between data points (PDw images) and the R 2 * relaxation model 31 . Fit residuals were normalized with the extrapolated value at TE = 0 and averaged across white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cardiac pulsation of the participants was recorded using a finger pulse oximeter. To minimize the effect of cardiac-induced noise on the images, data acquisition was suspended during the systolic period of the cardiac cycle, taken to last for a duration of 300 ms (Raynaud et al, 2023). For a heart rate of 80 beats per minute, this resulted in an increase in scan time by approximately 40%.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of evidence of non-exponential signal decay in subcortical regions has been attributed to the short timescale of the transition between the Gaussian and exponential behaviours, below the range of achievable echo times (Yablonskiy et al, 2021). Here, we combined a dense sampling of the decay curve with acquisition strategies that reduce the noise level in the data (Castella et al, 2018;Raynaud et al, 2023) to collect reliable evidence of non-exponential signal decay. Transverse relaxation decay exhibits a Gaussian behaviour at short echo times (TE≲5ms) with a transition towards exponential decay (Fig.…”
Section: Non-exponential Transverse Relaxation Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%