2008
DOI: 10.5516/net.2008.40.6.477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Characteristics-Based Implicit Finite-Difference Scheme for the Analysis of Instability in Water Cooled Reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the friction and acceleration pressure drops are recognized as the delayed pressure drops in the SCWR and can make the reactor unstable even though their combined magnitude is much lower than the gravitation pressure drop since the delayed pressure drop is considered to be responsible for DWOs. This is different from the case of the BWR, where the type-II instability for both FC and NC modes is due to the dominant friction pressure drop [29,30], whereas the type-I instability takes place due to the dominance of the gravitation pressure drop at the NC mode [26,[30][31][32]. Time-delayed transient distributions of pressure drops obtained with THRUST are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Variation Of Thermo-physical Properties In the Axial Directionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Therefore, the friction and acceleration pressure drops are recognized as the delayed pressure drops in the SCWR and can make the reactor unstable even though their combined magnitude is much lower than the gravitation pressure drop since the delayed pressure drop is considered to be responsible for DWOs. This is different from the case of the BWR, where the type-II instability for both FC and NC modes is due to the dominant friction pressure drop [29,30], whereas the type-I instability takes place due to the dominance of the gravitation pressure drop at the NC mode [26,[30][31][32]. Time-delayed transient distributions of pressure drops obtained with THRUST are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Variation Of Thermo-physical Properties In the Axial Directionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The steady-state solution methodology is explained in the flow chart, as mentioned in Figure 2(a). The shooting plus bracketing method 16,42 is employed throughout the axial domain to solve the discretized equations ( 5)- (7).…”
Section: Steady-state Solution Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present mathematical model is a simple one dimension nonlinear coupled balance mass, momentum and energy equations, which properties are varying along the axial direction. These balance equations are solved numerically [27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Development Of the Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%