2006
DOI: 10.1002/qre.788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A change point method for linear profile data

Abstract: We propose a change point approach based on the segmented regression technique for testing the constancy of the regression parameters in a linear profile data set. Each sample collected over time in the historical data set consists of several bivariate observations for which a simple linear regression model is appropriate. The change point approach is based on the likelihood ratio test for a change in one or more regression parameters. We compare the performance of this method to that of the most effective Pha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
177
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noorossana et al (2004) proposed MCUSUM procedure in combination with R chart proposed by Kang and Albin (2000) to improve the performance of the existing methods in phase II monitoring of simple linear profiles. Zou et al (2006) and Mahmoud et al (2007) proposed methods based on likelihood ratio statistics to monitor linear profiles in phase II and I, respectively. Gupta et al (2006) compared the performance of Kim et al (2003) method with a method developed by Croarkin and Varner (1982).. Jensen et al (2008) proposed linear mixed models to account for the autocorrelation within a linear profile.…”
Section: Literature Review On Monitoring the Quality Profiles In Phase Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noorossana et al (2004) proposed MCUSUM procedure in combination with R chart proposed by Kang and Albin (2000) to improve the performance of the existing methods in phase II monitoring of simple linear profiles. Zou et al (2006) and Mahmoud et al (2007) proposed methods based on likelihood ratio statistics to monitor linear profiles in phase II and I, respectively. Gupta et al (2006) compared the performance of Kim et al (2003) method with a method developed by Croarkin and Varner (1982).. Jensen et al (2008) proposed linear mixed models to account for the autocorrelation within a linear profile.…”
Section: Literature Review On Monitoring the Quality Profiles In Phase Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As profile monitoring falls under the broad field of functional data analysis, Ramsay and Silverman [83] discussed various examples of functional data or profiles. Mahmoud et al [84] presented a method to detect change points in linear profile monitoring using segmented regression technique. Some researchers used different terminologies to express the profile.…”
Section: Burzin Bhavnagri: Analyzing Eeg and Fmri Data For Sudden Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most change point methods perform well, comparing favorably to cusums that are perfectly tuned to the exact type of shift that has occurred and nearly optimally for a wide range of other disturbances. Several authors have recently investigated important applications of the change point in an SPC setting; for examples, see the papers by Perry et al 4,5 and Mahmoud et al 6 Other important areas of SPC research continue to be the use of a single control chart to simultaneously monitor both location and variability (see the important review paper by Cheng and Thaga 7 ), the integration of SPC with engineering process control (Runger et al 8 ), and adaptive control charts (that is, with variable sample sizes and/or sampling intervals). The paper by Wu et al 9 investigates such a procedure to monitor both the mean and the variance with cusums.…”
Section: Spc Research-current Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%