SAE Technical Paper Series 2007
DOI: 10.4271/2007-01-4196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CFD Multidimensional Approach to Hydraulic Components Design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The turbulent behavior of the fluid was addressed by means of a two-equation komega SST model in order to accurately predict the flow evolution in the viscous sublayer and in the free-stream region, as it combined the insensitivity to free-stream conditions of the k-epsilon model in the far-field with the advantages of the k-omega model near walls. Actually, several turbulence models were compared in [24], and the k-omega SST model showed particular accuracy in the prediction of the fluid-dynamic performance of the analyzed hydraulic components. This model's choice was further supported by the Wall-Y+ considerations since values slightly smaller than one were measured at the most critical areas of the fluid domain, such as in the gears' region and within leakages, due to the extremely reduced mesh size near walls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turbulent behavior of the fluid was addressed by means of a two-equation komega SST model in order to accurately predict the flow evolution in the viscous sublayer and in the free-stream region, as it combined the insensitivity to free-stream conditions of the k-epsilon model in the far-field with the advantages of the k-omega model near walls. Actually, several turbulence models were compared in [24], and the k-omega SST model showed particular accuracy in the prediction of the fluid-dynamic performance of the analyzed hydraulic components. This model's choice was further supported by the Wall-Y+ considerations since values slightly smaller than one were measured at the most critical areas of the fluid domain, such as in the gears' region and within leakages, due to the extremely reduced mesh size near walls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first one, Cq, is the efflux coefficient, and it is generally addressed to modify the reference area used for calculating the fluid velocity. For the purpose of this work, and according to the sensitivity analysis detailed in [14], all the orifices are characterized by adopting an efflux coefficient equal to 0.95. The second corrective parameter, Cm, is generally indicated as the mass flow-rate coefficient and, with respect to an isentropic subsonic efflux, it has to be expressed as:…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 This approach demonstrated in previous studies a good accuracy in predicting the flow field for multi-phase flows in hydraulic components. 17 The computational domain accounted for in the simulations includes the injector hole, the helical ducts and the injector body comprising the needle and the inlet duct. Downstream of the injector outlet a large plenum is considered in order to represent the open ambient at atmospheric pressure where the liquid spray is forming.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Single Injectormentioning
confidence: 99%