2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A CFD-based scaling approach for ducted propellers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are designed to improve the propulsion performances, taking advantage of different physical principles depending on the shape of the adopted nozzle. In this regard, they are classified as propulsion systems operating with either an accelerating or decelerating duct (e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are designed to improve the propulsion performances, taking advantage of different physical principles depending on the shape of the adopted nozzle. In this regard, they are classified as propulsion systems operating with either an accelerating or decelerating duct (e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that both approaches have merit; BEM, thanks to its simplicity and robustness can be used for general blade design, whereas RANS usually provides better results, especially at lower advance ratios where viscous effects are pronounced, but at a higher computational cost. The coupled BEM-RANS model was investigated in [11,12] for cavitating and non-cavitating conditions, where RANS methods were used for viscous flow analysis, namely wake and velocity fields, with respect to propeller forces calculated using BEM.Purely RANS approach in the context of propeller performance predictions has been extensively assessed over the past decade with the two-equation k-ω turbulence model as the most frequent model of choice [13]. The studies by Bhattacharyya et al [13] and Krasilnikov et al [14] utilized unstructured grids and focused on current scaling approaches with SST k-ω turbulence model as a validation and development tool.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Purely RANS approach in the context of propeller performance predictions has been extensively assessed over the past decade with the two-equation k-ω turbulence model as the most frequent model of choice [13]. The studies by Bhattacharyya et al [13] and Krasilnikov et al [14] utilized unstructured grids and focused on current scaling approaches with SST k-ω turbulence model as a validation and development tool.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the propeller of RDT has a duct, K T is the sum of the thrust coefficient of the propeller and duct, while K Q is the sum of the torque coefficient of propeller and duct, as below [21,22]:…”
Section: Geometry Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%