Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008) 2008
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2008.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Centrality Measure for Electrical Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
84
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
84
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the opposing community asserts that the pure topological CN approach loses the details of the physics behind Kirchhoff's laws and fails at predicting important aspects of power grids. In this respect, as mentioned, hybrid approaches include concepts from EE [82][83][84]96,[98][99][100][101][102]. Nonetheless, the CN approach with purely topological analysis (or even with extended ones to take into account minimal electrical information [34]) has been found to be useful to detect critical elements and to assess topological robustness [35,97,103].…”
Section: Discussion: Is the Cn Approach Useful In Power Grids?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the opposing community asserts that the pure topological CN approach loses the details of the physics behind Kirchhoff's laws and fails at predicting important aspects of power grids. In this respect, as mentioned, hybrid approaches include concepts from EE [82][83][84]96,[98][99][100][101][102]. Nonetheless, the CN approach with purely topological analysis (or even with extended ones to take into account minimal electrical information [34]) has been found to be useful to detect critical elements and to assess topological robustness [35,97,103].…”
Section: Discussion: Is the Cn Approach Useful In Power Grids?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent work of Hines et al [22,33,43] as well as Bompard et al [27,44,45] points towards the role of internode electrical distance measures in elucidating the structural features of power systems. Earlier works have used electric distance measures in a number of roles: [46] introduced nodeto-node voltage attenuation distances and used them in identifying voltage control zones; [47] used the same in assessing system voltage security; [48] to partition a system into localized reactive power markets; [49] used impedance sub-matrices to relate load and generator voltages as a distance metric for transmission use-of-system charging; later, and seemingly independently, Abdelkader et al [50][51][52] used closely related sub-matrices for power flow tracing and loss allocation purposes.…”
Section: B Candidate Distance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain authors [43] have simply used the off-diagonal elements of a system's Zbus matrix to populate a system distance matrix. The diagonal elements of the Zbus matrix are not generally zero, suggesting that it does not inherently encode distance information.…”
Section: ) Mutual Impedance Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrical centrality measure [4] assesses the structure of a network as a function of its electrical topology instead of its physical topology. Unlike the situation with conventional measures of network structure, power networks appear to have a scale-free structure when measured electrically; specifically, power networks have a number of highly-connected "hub" buses that should be examined thoroughly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%