A CEEMDAN-Assisted Deep Learning Model for the RUL Estimation of Solenoid Pumps

Abstract

This paper develops a data-driven remaining useful life prediction model for solenoid pumps. The model extracts high-level features using stacked autoencoders from decomposed pressure signals (using complementary ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) algorithm). These high-level features are then received by a recurrent neural network-gated recurrent units (GRUs) for the RUL estimation. The case study presented demonstrates the robustness of the proposed RUL estimation model with extensive empirical validations. Results support the validity of using the CEEMDAN for non-stationary signal decomposition and the accuracy, ease-of-use, and superiority of the proposed DL-based model for solenoid pump failure prognostics.

An Integrated Cost-Aware Dual Monitoring Framework for SMPS Switching Device Diagnosis

“…In the domain, recent research trends suggest the use of the more robust deep learning (DL)-based methods artificial neural networks (ANNs) over the more fundamental machine learning (ML) algorithms like K-Nearest Neighbor(KNN), gradient boosting classifier (GBC) Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forest (RF), Decision Tree (DT), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), etc. Although characterized with superior detection and predictive accuracy, these ANNs are still faced with interpretability challenges, excessive parameters dependence, demands big data, over-fitting/under-fitting issues, computational cost, and complexity [2,13,27,28]. On the bright side, ML algorithms are more interpretable, easy to use, efficient with little data, resource-friendly, and reliable given the right inputs [2].…”

A HYBRID CNN & BiLSTM WITH AM MODEL TO PREDICT AND ESTIMATE LOAD HARMONICS AT NESTLE EAST LONDON SOUTH AFRICA.

“…The noisy and complex features of time series data cannot be determined using analytical equation with parameters, since the dynamic equation for time series data is either unknown or extremely complex. These ML techniques require low-end hardware [17] and [18]. The power network management, through diagnostic and prognosis, of electrical power network harmonics through several techniques is enhanced using Machine Learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques that are bioinspired mathematical models [19].…”

A Wavelet-Based Diagnostic Framework for CRD Engine Injection Systems under Emulsified Fuel Conditions

“…On-going research suggests the use of bio-inspired mathematical models with deep architecture-traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methods-for optimal diagnostic performance; however, identifying the key diagnostic parameters from CR signals (inputs) remains open for continued studies. Beyond the limitations of traditional machine learning techniques such as random forests and decision trees, DL methods such as convolutional neural networks (CNN), recurrent neural networks (RNN), etc., are designed for large-scale systems designed with big data and demand for automated performance with little/no domain knowledge; however, the inherent issues of interpretability, high dependence on excessive parameters, overfitting/underfitting, need for high computational power, feature evaluation complexity, and their magical defiance from fundamental statistical principles often raise strong concerns for cost-aware and safety-critical applications [12,[32][33][34]. Particularly, due to the high stochasticity and complexity in their learning process, feature evaluation/selection (from an empirical perspective) is often limited; hence, this limits the explainability of the diagnostic model(s) based on feature importance/impact.…”

“…The predominance of AI across most disciplines has motivated the high discrimination against the traditional statistical model-based approaches for FDI. Theoretically, DL methods are quite popular for high detection accuracy; however, issues of interpretability, high dependence on excessive parameters, overfitting/underfitting issues, computational cost (and complexity), and the magical defiance from fundamental statistical theory make them practically unreliable for cost-aware industrial applications [12,[32][33][34]. On the other hand, most Bayesian ML methods come with benefits ranging from ease-of-use, interpretability, and computational efficiency on few data and provide reliable diagnostic results when provided with the right input-fault parameters/features.…”