2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cautionary note regarding count models of alcohol consumption in randomized controlled trials

Abstract: Background: Alcohol consumption is commonly used as a primary outcome in randomized alcohol treatment studies. The distribution of alcohol consumption is highly skewed, particularly in subjects with alcohol dependence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the distribution of the total depression scale score from the five items of the PHQ-9 was highly skewed and similar to that of a count variable, the Poisson distribution was considered for modeling the outcome, rather than the normal distribution. The depression scale score also exhibited overdispersion (i.e., variance greater than the mean, contrary to the assumption of equal mean and variance inherent in the Poisson distribution), as well as more zero values than would be expected under the Poisson distribution (39% of the depression scale scores were zero), so we also considered using a negative binomial model and zero-inflated models (19)(20)(21). Likelihood ratio and Vuong tests were used to compare models and select the most appropriate model, which turned out to be a zero-inflated negative binomial model (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the distribution of the total depression scale score from the five items of the PHQ-9 was highly skewed and similar to that of a count variable, the Poisson distribution was considered for modeling the outcome, rather than the normal distribution. The depression scale score also exhibited overdispersion (i.e., variance greater than the mean, contrary to the assumption of equal mean and variance inherent in the Poisson distribution), as well as more zero values than would be expected under the Poisson distribution (39% of the depression scale scores were zero), so we also considered using a negative binomial model and zero-inflated models (19)(20)(21). Likelihood ratio and Vuong tests were used to compare models and select the most appropriate model, which turned out to be a zero-inflated negative binomial model (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zero-inflated negative binomial models incorporate 2 separate models: a logistic model evaluating the association between covariates and having a non-zero versus a zero value for the outcome of interest, and a negative binomial model evaluating the association between covariates and a non-zero outcome following the negative binomial distribution (23). We present results as incidence rate ratios, which are calculated by exponentiating the coefficient estimates from the negative binomial model (20) and are interpreted as the risk associated with a particular characteristic relative to a reference group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model used English hospitalisation data to derive the incidence of alcohol-attributable diseases and injuries in the general population. The relative risks of such clinical events for each patient in the model, based on their simulated alcohol consumption and the incidence of events in the general population, were derived from published international epidemiological studies measuring the association between level of alcohol consumption and the risk of alcohol-attributable injuries or diseases [11,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. A summary of the main inputs to the microsimulation model is shown in figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, previous researcher [9] proposed a cautionary note regarding count models of alcohol consumption in randomized controlled trials. In this paper, the researchers considered Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, NB, ZIP and ZINB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zeroinflated models estimate two equations simultaneously; one for the count model and the other one are the excess zeros which are caused by the real ecological effect of interest. The analysis data with accessing high zero comprised the model of Poisson [3][4][5], Negative Binomial (NB) regression, zeroInflated Poisson (ZIP) [6][7][8][9], and Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial (ZINB) is widely used [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%