2007
DOI: 10.1093/logcom/exm045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Causal Theory of Abduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explains why the semantic for EM found by Flach does not use a preference relation between states. A similar comment is valid for the work of Bochman [4,5] who uses a rule called Weakening rule which corresponds to our full explanatory cut. In [20] two others (weaker) cut rules were introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This explains why the semantic for EM found by Flach does not use a preference relation between states. A similar comment is valid for the work of Bochman [4,5] who uses a rule called Weakening rule which corresponds to our full explanatory cut. In [20] two others (weaker) cut rules were introduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Despite the absent of a general definition of explanation, there have been several attempts to develop a logical account of explanatory reasoning [1][2][3][4][5]7,[10][11][12]20,22,23]. Some of these attempts have followed the so-called KLM methodology developed by Kraus, Lehmann and Magidor and many others for the study of consequence relations (see [16,18,19] and the references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some logics for causal reasoning (e.g., [4,7]) satisfy apparently much more properties than the formalism presented here. However, any comparison should keep in mind that here a new specific kind of "causal formulas" has been introduced by the way of the "causal atoms".…”
Section: Causal Relation Versus Predictive Inferencementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since {} and {α, ¬α} ⊥ obviously hold, it looks like the predictive inference relation satisfies all the postulates of a causal production relation as defined in [4] and all the properties of a disjunctive causal relation [3]. It must be pointed out that our hypotheses are expressed here in terms of causal formulas while our conclusions pertain to classical logic.…”
Section: Causal Relation Versus Predictive Inferencementioning
confidence: 99%